Service Delivery

Choosing employment: factors that impact employment decisions for individuals with intellectual disability.

Timmons et al. (2011) · Intellectual and developmental disabilities 2011
★ The Verdict

Employment choices for adults with IDD hinge on five key voices—sync them to boost job success.

✓ Read this if BCBAs writing employment plans for transition-age or adult clients.
✗ Skip if Clinicians focused only on early childhood or non-vocational goals.

01Research in Context

01

What this study did

The team talked to the adults with intellectual disability. They also talked to family, teachers, job coaches, and agency staff.

They asked one question: What helps you pick a job? They wrote down every answer and looked for patterns.

02

What they found

Five groups steer the choice: family wishes, school staff advice, agency culture, job developer skill, and the adult’s own likes.

When these groups agree, the adult gets a good job match. When they clash, the adult often lands in a poor fit or no job at all.

03

How this fits with other research

Vassos et al. (2016) found that person-centred planning helps people make daily choices. Timmons et al. (2011) shows those plans must also line up with family and staff views or the plan stalls.

Emerson et al. (2023) studied three states that hit high integrated-employment rates. Their seven policy levers echo the five local levers Ciulla found—just scaled up to state teams.

McConkey et al. (2010) warned that staff rank care tasks above social inclusion. Ciulla’s data adds that when staff culture values jobs, adults with IDD get better placements. The two studies fit like puzzle pieces.

04

Why it matters

You can map the five levers for each client. Ask the adult, the family, the teacher, the job coach, and the agency what a “good job” means. When answers differ, hold a quick meeting to align them. This small step can turn a plan on paper into a real paycheck.

Free CEUs

Want CEUs on This Topic?

The ABA Clubhouse has 60+ free CEUs — live every Wednesday. Ethics, supervision & clinical topics.

Join Free →
→ Action — try this Monday

List the five voices for your current client and schedule one 30-minute call to align them.

02At a glance

Intervention
not applicable
Design
qualitative
Population
intellectual disability, developmental delay
Finding
not reported

03Original abstract

Little is known about the factors that shape the employment-related decisions of individuals with intellectual and/or developmental disabilities. Findings from qualitative interviews with individuals, their family members, and employment-support professionals from four community rehabilitation providers throughout Massachusetts were reported. Recognizing the value of participatory action research, we also included a co-researcher with intellectual disability who participated in all facets of the research process. Findings revealed a collection of people and factors considered influential in employment-related decision-making. The family in the formative years, school-based staff and early employment experiences, the culture of the community rehabilitation providers, the job developer, and personal preferences all influenced participants' decisions. Through understanding these persuasive elements, we offer recommendations to those in the intellectual and developmental disabilities field to optimize employment choices and outcomes.

Intellectual and developmental disabilities, 2011 · doi:10.1352/1934-9556-49.4.285