National call for organizational change from sheltered to integrated employment.
Agencies can ditch sheltered workshops when state and federal leaders provide clear rules, steady money, and loud cheerleading.
01Research in Context
What this study did
The authors interviewed leaders at 10 U.S. agencies. All had shut down sheltered workshops and moved clients into regular jobs.
They asked how the change happened, what helped, and what hurt.
All agencies served adults with intellectual or developmental disabilities.
What they found
Every agency said the same thing: we could not do it alone.
State and federal leaders had to set clear rules, give money for job coaches, and keep cheering us on.
When that support was steady, clients landed real paychecks in real businesses.
How this fits with other research
Emerson et al. (2023) looked at whole states, not single agencies. They found the same recipe: IDD, VR, and education teams must share data, dollars, and goals.
Cheng et al. (2024) saw the pattern in China. There, small NGOs run the programs because national policy is still missing. The need for top-down leadership looks universal.
Navas et al. (2025) tested a parallel move—closing institutions and opening community homes. Quality of life jumped only when staff gave people real choices. The lesson matches this paper: new settings work only if supports follow.
Why it matters
You may not run an agency, but you sit at the table where supports are shaped. Ask your state council or regional center for written policies that fund job coaching, transportation, and follow-along. Share these stories to show that integrated employment is not a dream—it is a decision leaders can make today.
Want CEUs on This Topic?
The ABA Clubhouse has 60+ free CEUs — live every Wednesday. Ethics, supervision & clinical topics.
Join Free →Add one line to the ISP: ‘Job coach funding will be requested from regional center before day 1 of community placement.’
02At a glance
03Original abstract
Our purpose in this article is to contend that organizational change from sheltered to integrated employment is not only possible but necessary, and a federal Employment First agenda must be advanced. Findings are reported from interviews with senior managers from 10 organizations that have shifted their service delivery to community employment, and recommendations are provided based on these findings. Results reveal the commonalities among a diverse group of agencies, suggesting the viability of transformation of our current systems with the support and leadership of state and federal agencies and programs.
Intellectual and developmental disabilities, 2011 · doi:10.1352/1934-9556-49.4.248