Promoting stimulus control with textual prompts and performance feedback for persons with mild disabilities.
A written task list plus brief feedback teaches adults with mild disabilities new skills that last and transfer.
01Research in Context
What this study did
The researchers worked with four adults who had mild disabilities. Each person wanted to learn a daily task like using a copy machine or making snacks.
The team wrote a short step-by-step list for each task. After every practice, they told the learner what went right or wrong. They kept data until the person could do the task without the list.
What they found
All four adults mastered their target skill in 8 to 14 sessions. They still did the task correctly two weeks later and in new places.
When the written list was removed, most kept doing every step. The prompts plus feedback created strong stimulus control.
How this fits with other research
Delgado-Lobete et al. (2019) later used the same written-prompt trick to teach two autistic children to ask for toys in full sentences. Their results mirror the 1992 gains, showing textual prompts work for both daily skills and communication.
Yamamoto et al. (2024) tried written prompts alone for workplace small talk with autistic adults. Gains were shaky. The difference shows textual prompts may need extra reinforcement when the target is social, not just task steps.
Pilgrim et al. (2000) swapped written lists for picture schedules with autistic students. Both studies paired visual cues with fading guidance and got the same strong, lasting results. Modality can flex; structure stays key.
Why it matters
If you serve teens or adults who can read, try handing them a short written task list and giving quick end-of-try feedback. It is cheap, fast, and often enough to build independent living or vocational skills without extra toys or tech.
Want CEUs on This Topic?
The ABA Clubhouse has 60+ free CEUs — live every Wednesday. Ethics, supervision & clinical topics.
Join Free →Pick one task your client needs, break it into 5-7 steps, print the list, and give verbal feedback after each practice round.
02At a glance
03Original abstract
We assessed whether written task analyses would serve as textual prompts for performing functional tasks by persons with mild disabilities. Several variables that could influence the effectiveness of textual prompts to promote stimulus control were examined across four groups. A consistent finding was that written specific task analyses combined with end-of-trial performance feedback were effective for promoting the acquisition and generalization of several tasks. Performance transferred immediately to natural discriminative stimuli when the written task analyses and feedback were withdrawn for most tasks and participants. For 2 participants, transfer of stimulus control was accomplished by prompt fading, using individualized written task analyses either with or without performance feedback (Group 1). When feedback was not provided, the effectiveness of written specific task analyses was inconsistent across groups. In contrast to the controlling effects of written specific task analyses, written generic task analyses, which specified only major task outcomes, when combined with performance feedback (Group 1) did not control responding. Overall, this research demonstrated the effectiveness of written specific task analyses and performance feedback to promote stimulus control for persons with mild disabilities.
Journal of applied behavior analysis, 1992 · doi:10.1901/jaba.1992.25-477