Autism & Developmental

Effect of augmented sensorimotor input on learning verbal and nonverbal tasks among children with autism spectrum disorders.

Latham et al. (2014) · Journal of autism and developmental disorders 2014
★ The Verdict

Gentle hand guidance plus touch while the child moves boosts both word and puzzle learning in autism.

✓ Read this if BCBAs teaching young children with autism in clinic or home settings.
✗ Skip if Teams only using video or tablet lessons without physical materials.

01Research in Context

01

What this study did

Latham et al. (2014) worked with children who have autism.

They compared two teaching styles.

One group watched the teacher.

The other group got gentle hand guidance plus touch prompts while they moved.

Both groups then tried verbal and non-verbal tasks.

02

What they found

Kids who felt the prompts and moved with help scored higher on both kinds of tasks.

Watching alone was not as helpful.

The extra touch and movement made learning stick better.

03

How this fits with other research

Houten et al. (1983) already showed that simple spoken prompts help autistic kids respond.

Latham et al. (2014) adds touch and movement, building on that old idea.

Fantasia et al. (2020) found that letting kids control a tablet also boosts memory.

Both papers say active beats passive.

Tse (2019) seems to disagree.

That study told kids to focus on their own arm, not the target, and it worked best.

Latham et al. (2014) used outside hand guidance, yet still won.

The gap is in the task: Cy taught throwing, O taught words and puzzles.

Different skills need different cues.

04

Why it matters

You can raise scores by guiding the child’s hands and adding light touch.

Next time you teach a new puzzle or word, stand behind the learner, place your hands over theirs, and move together.

Fade the help once they move on their own.

This quick add-on costs nothing and pairs well with your current prompts.

Free CEUs

Want CEUs on This Topic?

The ABA Clubhouse has 60+ free CEUs — live every Wednesday. Ethics, supervision & clinical topics.

Join Free →
→ Action — try this Monday

Guide the learner’s hands through the first three trials of a new task, then fade to shadowing.

02At a glance

Intervention
prompting and fading
Design
randomized controlled trial
Sample size
34
Population
autism spectrum disorder
Finding
positive
Magnitude
medium

03Original abstract

Thirty-four children, with autism spectrum disorders, ages 4-14 years, were matched and randomly assigned to one of two conditions for learning a novel juice-making task and producing two novel words about the event. Seventeen sighted children were manually guided to perform the task and tactually prompted during imitated productions of novel words for the event. Their matched controls heard the novel words and watched the juice-making task being performed. Performances on four verbal and two nonverbal measures right after instruction and at 24-48 h post-instruction, revealed higher scores for the ‘‘hands-on’’, participation than observation group on both verbal and nonverbal tasks. This study offers a paradigm for exploring the instructional advantage of enhanced participatory experience.

Journal of autism and developmental disorders, 2014 · doi:10.1007/s10803-013-1990-9