Object manipulation: an interactional strategy with autistic children.
Mirror the child’s exact toy and action to spark more object play and longer looks.
01Research in Context
What this study did
Four autistic children played alone first. Then an adult either copied the child’s exact toy and action or played his own way.
The researchers counted how often and how long each child touched toys in both conditions. They switched the order every day to be sure the results were fair.
What they found
When the adult copied, kids handled toys more often and for longer stretches. The boost showed up right away and stayed across days.
Copying the child’s chosen toy and move was the key, not just being friendly.
How this fits with other research
Three years later the same team repeated the trick. Bryant et al. (1984) kept the copy-cat play but measured eye contact instead of toy touch. Again, kids gave far more looks when adults mirrored them.
Petry et al. (2007) stretched the idea further. They used short videos of two peers modeling play moves. Kids still gained social play and kept the gains for months.
Taylor et al. (1993) looked at many play studies and found autistic children can show pretend play if someone prompts first. The copy-cat tactic is one easy prompt that needs no toys or scripts.
Why it matters
You can raise toy contact and eye contact in the same minute. Just watch what the child picks up, then do the same thing with a matching toy. No extra materials, no data sheets. Try it during free play or while waiting for the next activity.
Want CEUs on This Topic?
The ABA Clubhouse has 60+ free CEUs — live every Wednesday. Ethics, supervision & clinical topics.
Join Free →Pick one toy the child chose, sit beside them, copy the move for one minute, count if touches increase.
02At a glance
03Original abstract
The present research compared the effect of three play procedures upon the frequency and duration of object manipulation by six autistic children. The three interaction play procedures varied in the degree of similarity between the adult's and the child's performances. In procedure 1, the experimenter imitated the subject's movements with her duplicate object. In procedure 2, the experimenter performed a different movement with her duplicate object. In procedure 3, the experimenter performed a different action on a different object. The interaction procedure, in which the experimenter imitated both the material and the method of play chosen by the autistic child, resulted in greater frequency and duration of object manipulation.
Journal of autism and developmental disorders, 1981 · doi:10.1007/BF01531617