ABA Fundamentals

Teaching generalized table bussing. The importance of negative teaching examples.

Horner et al. (1986) · Behavior modification 1986
★ The Verdict

Add short "don't do it" clips to your general-case video set and students with ID will bus any table the first time.

✓ Read this if BCBAs teaching vocational or cafeteria skills in middle or high school.
✗ Skip if Clinicians working only on verbal behavior or discrete-trial programs.

01Research in Context

01

What this study did

Collier et al. (1986) worked with students who have moderate or severe intellectual disability.

The team wanted the students to clear any cafeteria table, not just the one they practiced on.

They used general-case instruction plus negative teaching examples. Kids saw what to do and what not to do.

02

What they found

The students cleaned new, untrained tables correctly.

The skill stuck without extra teaching.

Adding clear "wrong way" clips helped the rule sink in.

03

How this fits with other research

Sprague et al. (1984) showed that three vending-machine examples beat one. H et al. added the "don't" clips to the same logic.

Milata et al. (2020) copied the plan with video modeling for teens with autism. Both studies got broad use of new machines.

Mates (1990) took the idea further, saying we can teach speech the same way. Table-bussing was the first brick in a bigger wall.

04

Why it matters

If you run community-based instruction, build a quick video library. Show three right ways and one clear wrong way.

Learners see the full range and transfer the skill faster. You save teaching time later.

Free CEUs

Want CEUs on This Topic?

The ABA Clubhouse has 60+ free CEUs — live every Wednesday. Ethics, supervision & clinical topics.

Join Free →
→ Action — try this Monday

Film one wrong table-bussing clip and splice it into your training video; run a single probe on a new table.

02At a glance

Intervention
other
Design
single case other
Population
intellectual disability
Finding
positive

03Original abstract

This study examines the effects of using positive and negative training examples within a "general case"teaching format to train students with moderate and severe mental retardation to bus tables in cafeteria settings. The primary dependent variable was performance across a set of 15 nontrained tables in two nontrained cafeteria settings. The 15 nontrained tables were selected to sample the range of different stimulus and response demands for table bussing in cafeteria settings. Social validation of the effect was also assessed under maximally normal work conditions. The independent variable was the use of general case instruction with "negative" training examples (i.e., examples in which the learner is not to perform the target response). Results indicate a functional relationship between correct responding with the nontrained tables and general case instruction. The importance of selecting both positive and negative training examples when teaching generalized skills is discussed.

Behavior modification, 1986 · doi:10.1177/01454455860104005