Using General‐Case Procedures to Teach Graphing Skills to Undergraduate Students
A short computer lesson lets college students generalize Excel graphing to brand-new data sets.
01Research in Context
What this study did
Vecchia and team taught Excel graphing to college students. They used a general-case computer program. The program showed many types of graphs and data sets.
Four students got the training in a multiple-baseline design. Each learned to make line and bar graphs. They practiced with new data they had never seen before.
What they found
After only a few hours, most students could graph new data correctly. They made line graphs and bar graphs without help. Skills stayed strong when tested later.
One student needed a quick booster. Then she also graphed new data perfectly. The computer method worked for all four.
How this fits with other research
O'Grady et al. (2021) also used computer lessons with undergraduates. They taught students to read AB graphs, not make them. Both studies show computers teach graph skills fast.
Higbee et al. (2016) used the same design and ICT method. They taught teachers to run discrete trials. Both papers prove ICT works for different skills and groups.
Blair et al. (2020) give a free tutorial for building these lessons. You can copy their steps to make your own Excel graphing module.
Why it matters
You can flip graph training to a computer. Students learn faster than with live lecture. They still graph new data weeks later. Use the Blair tutorial to build a short module. Assign it before lab sessions. You save class time for higher-level work like interpreting graphs instead of clicking buttons.
Want CEUs on This Topic?
The ABA Clubhouse has 60+ free CEUs — live every Wednesday. Ethics, supervision & clinical topics.
Join Free →Email your students the free Blair tutorial link and assign the 30-minute Excel module before next class.
02At a glance
03Original abstract
ABSTRACT As fluency in technology becomes more of a requirement in many fields, identifying an effective and efficient way to teach technology skills, such as spreadsheets, is necessary. In the field of behavior analysis, many studies assessed methods to teach graphing skills, but few have reported programming for or assessing generalization of these skills. One effective way to program for generalization is through general‐case procedures, which produces behavior change across a variety of stimuli and responses while requiring minimal training time. The current study used a nonconcurrent multiple‐baseline design across participants to assess the effects of general‐case procedures and computer‐based instruction on graph training in Excel and to program for and assess within and across‐category generalization of responding with undergraduate college students. These procedures resulted in generalized responding within and across stimuli and response categories for most participants. Future research should further evaluate the application of general‐case procedures outside of behavior analysis.
Behavioral Interventions, 2025 · doi:10.1002/bin.70049