Escape and avoidance of shock by pigeons pecking a key.
Gradually delaying shock after a response can turn escape into lasting avoidance.
01Research in Context
What this study did
Researchers worked with three pigeons in a small chamber.
A key was lit on the wall. If the bird pecked it during a tone, the tone stopped and no shock came.
First the birds could stop an ongoing shock by pecking. Then the team slowly moved the shock earlier, so pecks had to come before shock.
The goal was to see if escape pecks could turn into true avoidance pecks.
What they found
Two of the three birds kept pecking even when shock was fully avoided.
The third bird quit once shocks stopped happening.
The escape-to-avoidance fade worked for most birds.
How this fits with other research
Kelly et al. (1970) swapped the key for a floor treadle. Pigeons learned even faster, showing the response form matters.
Edwards et al. (1970) added a warning light. Birds used the signal to time their pecks, proving signals sharpen avoidance.
Johnston et al. (1972) later mapped how soon the shock must follow a treadle press. Shorter gaps made birds press more, giving parametric flesh to the same paradigm.
Why it matters
You can build avoidance from escape by fading immediacy.
Try starting with an escape contingency your client already does, then delay the aversive event bit by bit.
Watch response topography; a switch from hand-flap to switch-press might speed acquisition, just like treadle beat key-peck in pigeons.
Want CEUs on This Topic?
The ABA Clubhouse has 60+ free CEUs — live every Wednesday. Ethics, supervision & clinical topics.
Join Free →Pick an escape response your client already uses, then add a one-second delay before the aversive is removed and slowly stretch the interval.
02At a glance
03Original abstract
Pigeons had been trained to peck a key when each peck removed a slowly increasing series of electric shocks. Without loss of the established key-pecking response, the birds were gradually weaned from this procedure to one where intense shocks were presented suddenly, duplicating features that had proved ineffective for initial shaping of the response. Finally, a procedure was introduced in which key pecks could avoid shock. Avoidance responding was maintained in two of three pigeons.
Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior, 1969 · doi:10.1901/jeab.1969.12-533