ABA Fundamentals

DISCRIMINATED TIME-OUT AVOIDANCE IN PIGEONS.

THOMAS (1965) · Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior 1965
★ The Verdict

A five-minute time-out with a warning signal keeps avoidance responding at its peak.

✓ Read this if BCBAs teaching safety or escape skills in clinic or school settings.
✗ Skip if Clinicians who only run reinforcement-heavy plans with no avoidance component.

01Research in Context

01

What this study did

Pigeons pecked a key to avoid mild shock. A flashing light gave 30-second warnings.

If the bird pecked during the light, it earned a time-out from the shock schedule.

The team tried three time-out lengths: short, five-minute, and fifteen-minute.

02

What they found

Five-minute time-outs kept the birds pecking the most. Shorter or longer ones worked less well.

A drug that slows people down, chlorpromazine, made the birds peck even more for time-out.

03

How this fits with other research

Findley et al. (1965) ran the same time-out plan with a chimp the same year. Both species learned the rule, so the effect is not just a bird thing.

Edwards et al. (1970) later dropped the time-out part and kept only the warning light. Pigeons still used the light, showing the signal itself is powerful.

Johnston et al. (1972) stretched or shrank the seconds between response and shock. They also saw rate climb with shorter intervals, matching the five-minute sweet spot found here.

04

Why it matters

You now know a medium-length break keeps avoidance behavior strong. Use five-minute activity breaks when teaching escape or avoidance skills. Pair the break with a clear warning stimulus so the learner knows when the chance is open. Watch for side-effects if the client takes calming meds; the response pattern may shift.

Free CEUs

Want CEUs on This Topic?

The ABA Clubhouse has 60+ free CEUs — live every Wednesday. Ethics, supervision & clinical topics.

Join Free →
→ Action — try this Monday

Set a 5-minute timed break and a 30-second warning cue when running escape training.

02At a glance

Intervention
other
Design
single case other
Sample size
2
Finding
positive

03Original abstract

Performances of two pigeons were studied on a concurrent discriminated TO avoidance-VR schedule. Each avoidance response postponed a TO from a VR 140 for a specified RS interval. The warning stimulus on the TO avoidance schedule was a discontinuous clock which consisted of a series of discrete color changes that varied systematically with the RS interval. Experimental manipulations established that the avoidance behavior was under the control of the avoidance schedule and the discontinuous clock. Five-min TOs maintained higher avoidance rates than shorter TO durations; a 15-min TO maintained less avoidance responding than the 5-min TO. Chlorpromazine hydrochloride increased TO avoidance behavior and decreased concurrent VR behavior.

Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior, 1965 · doi:10.1901/jeab.1965.8-329