A note on time out from avoidance with the chimpanzee.
Time-out only works well when it matches the learner’s current reinforcement schedule and past training.
01Research in Context
What this study did
Scientists worked with one chimpanzee that could press a lever to avoid mild shock.
They added fixed-interval time-outs. Every few minutes the lever stopped working for a short break.
They watched how the time-outs changed the animal’s shock-avoidance rate.
What they found
The chimp’s lever pressing changed during time-out. The exact pattern depended on the avoidance schedule already in place.
Earlier training history also shaped how the animal reacted to the breaks.
How this fits with other research
THOMAS (1965) ran a similar test with pigeons the same year. Pigeons pecked most when time-out lasted five minutes, not shorter or longer ones.
BAER (1960) showed preschool kids would work to avoid losing candy. Both studies say brief removal of something good or bad can drive avoidance.
Together the papers show time-out effects hinge on timing, species, and what the animal already knows.
Why it matters
Your client’s learning history can make or break a time-out plan. Check what reinforcement schedule is running before you insert a break. If the child is used to a fast pace, a long time-out may back-fire. Start with short breaks and track response rate right after.
Get CEUs on This Topic — Free
The ABA Clubhouse has 60+ on-demand CEUs including ethics, supervision, and clinical topics like this one. Plus a new live CEU every Wednesday.
Record the client’s response rate for ten minutes, then insert a 30-second time-out and watch if responding speeds up or slows down.
02At a glance
03Original abstract
Fixed-interval responding which produced time out from shock avoidance schedules was established in a chimpanzee. Two widely differing discriminated avoidance schedules were employed in a multiple schedule arrangement. Differences in fixed interval rate were found to be related both to the schedule from which the subject was escaping and to the amount of training.
Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior, 1965 · doi:10.1901/jeab.1965.8-419