Signalled and unsignalled free-operant avoidance in the pigeon.
Warning signals make avoidance behavior clean and cue-bound; without them, learners invent idiosyncratic timing or burst patterns.
01Research in Context
What this study did
Researchers worked with four pigeons in small chambers. Each bird could peck a key to avoid mild electric shocks.
Two setups were tested. In one, a tone sounded before shocks could happen. In the other, no tone warned the bird.
What they found
With the warning tone, pigeons quickly learned to peck and turn the tone off. Without the tone, birds used different tricks.
Some birds timed their pecks like a clock. Others pecked wildly right after a shock, then waited.
How this fits with other research
Zeiler (1968) showed rats can avoid shock by holding and releasing a bar during a single light. The rats needed one clear signal. The pigeons in Edwards et al. (1970) proved birds can also master avoidance, but they do it with or without that signal.
Rapport et al. (1982) later found pigeons can tell if their own last move was a peck or a pause. Together these papers show pigeons use both outside cues and their own past acts to guide future behavior.
BAER (1960) got preschool kids to avoid losing toys by brief reinforcement withdrawal. Kids, rats, and pigeons all avoid bad events, but the cue they use—and the response form—changes with species and setup.
Why it matters
When you teach safety or escape skills, decide if a clear warning signal is possible. If you can give a signal, use it; behavior will lock on fast. If no signal exists, build timing or self-monitoring skills instead. The pigeon data say learners will find their own cue—help them pick a useful one.
Want CEUs on This Topic?
The ABA Clubhouse has 60+ free CEUs — live every Wednesday. Ethics, supervision & clinical topics.
Join Free →Add a brief auditory or visual cue two seconds before a prompt or demand—then let the client escape the task by performing the target response during that cue.
02At a glance
03Original abstract
Pigeons were trained to depress a lever to avoid electric shock under free-operant avoidance schedules without a warning signal, or with a warning signal that could be terminated only by a response. Most birds in the signalled avoidance procedure terminated more than 50% of the warning signals before shock. In the unsignalled avoidance procedure, several birds formed a temporal discrimination and received relatively few shocks; other birds responded only in post-shock bursts, and received many more shocks.
Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior, 1970 · doi:10.1901/jeab.1970.13-283