The Effects of Monetary Incentives on Planned and Unplanned Absences in Adolescent Part-Time Employees: a Cost-Effectiveness Analysis
A $264 attendance-bonus pool cut teen worker absences 60% and still saved money.
01Research in Context
What this study did
The authors paid teen workers a small cash bonus for showing up to every shift. They ran an ABAB reversal so the bonus came and went twice.
The kids were neurotypical part-timers at a community job. The team tracked planned and surprise absences and added up what substitutes cost.
What they found
Absences dropped 60% when the bonus was on. The whole bonus pool was only $264, but saved more than that by cutting substitute hires.
Both planned call-offs and last-minute no-shows fell, so shifts stayed fully staffed.
How this fits with other research
Haemmerlie (1983) did the same reversal trick with adult staff in a group home. They traded one paid day off for perfect monthly attendance and also saw fewer absences plus calmer residents. The teen study extends that idea to after-school jobs and swaps cash for time-off.
Washington et al. (2014) used prize draws to boost step counts in adults. Only a third responded, showing token cash works better when the target is attendance rather than exercise.
Kodera et al. (1976) proved a single $5 bill beats three reminders: low-income parents scheduled dental visits. Berkovits et al. (2019) keeps the tiny-budget theme but moves the incentive from health care to workplace reliability.
Why it matters
If you supervise adolescent staff, RBTs, or student interns, a micro-bonus can buy reliable coverage for less than the cost of calling in subs. Track attendance for two weeks, post the simple rule (“Perfect schedule this pay period = $10 gift card”), and watch no-shows shrink. You can fund it from the money you already waste on replacement labor.
Want CEUs on This Topic?
The ABA Clubhouse has 60+ free CEUs — live every Wednesday. Ethics, supervision & clinical topics.
Join Free →Pick your most unreliable shift, post a $10 perfect-attendance reward for the next two-week schedule, and graph absences before and after.
02At a glance
03Original abstract
Few attendance interventions have (a) addressed the issue of absenteeism as it applies to part-time adolescent employees, (b) distinguished between planned and unplanned absences, and (c) presented a cost-effectiveness analysis of the intervention. This study employed an A-B-A reversal design, including a small monetary bonus for attendance by part-time adolescent employees. Results indicate a 60% reduction in average group absences during the monetary contingency phase as compared to both baseline phases. The organization spent a total of $264 on monetary incentives during the intervention phase and reduced time spent on hiring and training substitute personnel by approximately 60%. Supervisors reported that a better staff–child ratio helped decrease chaos in the classroom and promoted an overall improvement in the quality of the youth groups.
Behavior Analysis in Practice, 2019 · doi:10.1007/s40617-018-00274-w