A study on the effects of some reinforcers to improve performance of employees in a retail industry.
Let staff pick tiny, low-cost perks—cash, casual dress, or flex time—and performance gains stick around for months.
01Research in Context
What this study did
Dilip and team worked with retail employees. They wanted to see if small perks could lift sales and service.
Staff chose what they wanted: extra cash, a paid day off, casual dress, or flex hours. The study tracked work quality for six months.
What they found
Every reinforcer worked. Sales rose and errors dropped.
Cheap picks—jeans instead of suits, leaving an hour early—kept the gains for half a year.
How this fits with other research
Haemmerlie (1983) ran a similar test in a group home. One bonus day off cut staff absences and even lowered resident problem behavior.
Berkovits et al. (2019) later showed a tiny cash bonus slashed teen worker absences by 60%. Money still works, but Dilip proves you don’t need much.
Galuska et al. (2006) seems to clash. They gave staff cash for learning preference assessments, yet skills barely budged. The key difference: Dilip paired money with clear daily goals, while M paid for vague “training.” Instructions plus feedback, not cash alone, drive learning.
Why it matters
You can boost staff performance without a big budget. Ask each employee what perk they want. Try jeans Friday, a late-start Monday, or a $20 gift card. Track one simple metric—items scanned per hour, compliments received, or days on time. Review the numbers weekly and keep the reinforcer in place as long as performance stays up.
Want CEUs on This Topic?
The ABA Clubhouse has 60+ free CEUs — live every Wednesday. Ethics, supervision & clinical topics.
Join Free →Email your team a three-item choice list (casual dress, early leave, coffee card) and tie the top pick to this week’s attendance goal.
02At a glance
03Original abstract
Two field experiments were conducted in the Business Information Technology Department of a major retail industry to analyze the impact of positive task performance reinforcers. The employees were divided into two broad groups - those performing complex tasks and those performing relatively simpler tasks. The first group was further divided into two subgroups, one being reinforced with money and paid leave and the other with feedback. Both the subgroups showed a significant improvement in performance behavior. However, feedback had a stronger effect on task performance even after the reinforcement was withdrawn. The second group of employees was allowed to choose reinforcers of their liking. Two simple techniques, a casual dress code and flexible working hours chosen by them, had a positive effect on their performance, which continued even after 6 months into the intervention. Besides, the procedure for the second group required no monetary or work-time loss to the employer.
Behavior modification, 2006 · doi:10.1177/0145445506273222