A longitudinal study of informational interventions to save energy in an office building.
Simple posted prompts can trim office energy use and keep partial savings a year later.
01Research in Context
What this study did
Workers in one office building got simple signs and notes about saving heat. The signs stayed up for two winters. The team checked if workers still saved energy one year later.
No extra rewards or money were offered. Just clear prompts placed where people would see them.
What they found
Energy waste dropped right away during both winters. One year after the signs came down, workers still used less heat than before the study started.
The drop was not perfect, but it held. Simple words on paper kept some savings alive.
How this fits with other research
Davol et al. (1977) first proved that daily prompts plus feedback can cut home electricity use. The new study moves the same idea into an office and still sees savings.
Annable et al. (1979) showed that letting families read their own meter saves 7% electricity. The office study skips self-monitoring and still wins, meaning prompts alone can work.
Van der Molen et al. (2010) added small rewards and saved about 15% in a college dorm. The office study kept rewards out, showing the prompt/feedback core is strong by itself.
Why it matters
You can cut utility bills tomorrow by posting clear heat-saving signs near thermostats. No tokens, no apps, no extra staff time. The gains may fade, but they do not crash to zero, so one cheap move can give months of benefit. Try it in any adult setting where you want quick, low-effort behavior change.
Want CEUs on This Topic?
The ABA Clubhouse has 60+ free CEUs — live every Wednesday. Ethics, supervision & clinical topics.
Join Free →Print a clear heat-saving sign and tape it above the staff-room thermostat.
02At a glance
03Original abstract
Informational interventions were employed to promote two behaviors relevant for efficient heating of individual offices in a large office building. In two successive winter seasons, interventions were applied during 4-week periods. Short-term effects were assessed weekly, and long-term effects were assessed 1 year after each of the two intervention periods. Improvements were observed in each intervention period, with partial behavior maintenance 1 year later. The changes observed in the individual offices across conditions are suggestive of the program's capacity to correct relapses in earlier proenvironmental behavior.
Journal of applied behavior analysis, 2000 · doi:10.1901/jaba.2000.33-101