ABA Fundamentals

An experimental analysis of electricity conservation procedures.

Palmer et al. (1977) · Journal of applied behavior analysis 1977
★ The Verdict

A daily door-note showing kilowatt-hours and cost cut household electricity use by about one-third.

✓ Read this if BCBAs who want a cheap, fast way to show clients the power of feedback loops.
✗ Skip if Clinicians looking for social-skills or verbal-behavior protocols.

01Research in Context

01

What this study did

Four families got a note on the front door every day. The note showed yesterday’s kilowatt-hours and the dollar cost. Some days the note also had a short slogan like “Save energy today.”

The researchers turned the notes on and off in an ABAB pattern. They read the home electric meter each morning to see if power use changed.

02

What they found

When the notes were posted, electricity dropped about one-third. When the notes stopped, use went back up. The drop returned when the notes came back, showing the notes caused the change.

03

How this fits with other research

Annable et al. (1979) ran a similar test but had people read their own meter instead of getting a door note. Self-monitoring still saved power, only the saving was smaller and lasted months after staff left.

Van der Molen et al. (2010) added small rewards to the same prompt-plus-feedback package in a college dorm. The extra rewards kept the 15 % saving even with busy young adults.

Pandey et al. (2016) moved the idea online, emailing prompts and energy dashboards to whole campus buildings. They did not report final numbers, but the method shows the 1977 trick still works in digital form.

04

Why it matters

You can cut problem behavior with simple feedback loops. The same rule works for electricity. Try posting one clear number the client can see every day — kilowatt-hours, minutes on task, or rate of tantrums. When the measure is visible and daily, change happens fast and reverses when you remove it, giving you clean proof your intervention is working.

Free CEUs

Want CEUs on This Topic?

The ABA Clubhouse has 60+ free CEUs — live every Wednesday. Ethics, supervision & clinical topics.

Join Free →
→ Action — try this Monday

Pick one client behavior, post yesterday’s count on the fridge, and watch the number move.

02At a glance

Intervention
other
Design
reversal abab
Sample size
4
Population
neurotypical
Finding
positive
Magnitude
large

03Original abstract

Daily electricity consumption of four families was recorded for 106 days. A reversal design, consisting of various experimental conditions interspersed between repeated baseline conditions, was used. During experimental conditions, daily prompts (written conservation slogans attached to front doors) and/or daily feedback (daily kilowatts consumed and daily cost information) were in effect. Maximum consumption occurred during the initial baseline; minimum consumption occurred during different experimental conditions for different families. The mean decrease from the maximum to the minimum for all families was 35%. Reversals in consumption were demonstrated in three families, although successive baselines tended to decrease. No clear differences in effectiveness between prompting and feedback conditions were apparent. The procedures used resulted in considerable dollar savings for the families.

Journal of applied behavior analysis, 1977 · doi:10.1901/jaba.1977.10-665