The use of peer monitors to reduce negative interaction during recess.
Let disruptive students police recess behavior with a simple point sheet and their own problem behavior drops.
01Research in Context
What this study did
The authors set up a point system at recess. Students with intellectual disability served as peer monitors. They gave or took away points for negative behavior like hitting or name-calling. The study used a multiple-baseline design across three recess settings. Researchers tracked how often each child acted out.
What they found
Negative interactions dropped when peer monitors were on duty. The same thing happened when students later monitored their own behavior. When the monitor and target students swapped roles, both sets kept their gains. The simple act of watching others helped the monitors behave better too.
How this fits with other research
Neef et al. (1986) ran a direct replication the next year. They showed the monitor role itself was the key ingredient. All three disruptive boys cut their own negative acts while serving as monitors. Buskist et al. (1988) extended the idea by flipping roles daily. Monitor and point-earner days both kept fifth-graders on task, so no one got stuck in one job. Einfeld et al. (1995) added self-evaluation to the token mix. Students rated their own social behavior and gained even bigger peer-interaction boosts. Together these studies build a toolkit: peer monitor, role swap, self-score.
Why it matters
You can turn recess chaos into a learning lab. Pick two students who often clash. Give them a clipboard and five plastic tokens. Each token equals one point. Their job is to hand out points for safe, kind play and take one away for shoves or insults. Swap the pair every week so everyone gets a turn. After a month, let students tally their own points. You get calmer recess minutes and teach self-management at the same time.
Want CEUs on This Topic?
The ABA Clubhouse has 60+ free CEUs — live every Wednesday. Ethics, supervision & clinical topics.
Join Free →Hand two students a point card and five counters; tell them to award or remove one counter for each safe or unsafe recess act and swap the monitors next week.
02At a glance
03Original abstract
The negative interactions of a midly retarded child, Dennis, were reduced in three daily recess periods, with the use of a point system. Adult monitors initiated the intervention in the morning recess; reductions achieved during adult monitoring were maintained in that recess during two subsequent conditions: peer monitoring and self-monitoring. Dennis' negative interactions were reduced next in the afternoon recess by peer monitors. Again, reductions were maintained during a subsequent self-monitoring condition. Finally, during the noon recess, Dennis was trained to serve as a peer monitor for Ed, a moderately retarded classmate. Dennis' rate of negative interactions quickly decreased following his appointment as a peer monitor. The results show that a point system, originally designed for adult monitoring, can be adapted without loss of program effectiveness for peer monitoring or self-monitoring. The results also suggest that classmates who serve as peer monitors may benefit significantly from their role. The conditions under which these therapeutic effects occur and the role that treatment order effects may play in this process require further investigation.
Journal of applied behavior analysis, 1985 · doi:10.1901/jaba.1985.18-141