Practitioner Development

Training basic teaching skills to community and institutional support staff for people with severe disabilities: a one-day program.

Parsons et al. (1996) · Research in developmental disabilities 1996
★ The Verdict

A single-day BST bundle reliably turns support staff into solid teachers for learners with severe disabilities.

✓ Read this if BCBAs who train new staff in group homes, workshops, or schools.
✗ Skip if Teams already using video or simulation packages with proven fidelity.

01Research in Context

01

What this study did

The team packed a full BST course into one workday. Staff watched short lessons, saw video demos, practiced with a coach, and got on-the-job feedback.

Twenty-four community and institutional support workers took the class. All served adults or children with severe intellectual disability.

The goal was simple: teach the basic teaching skills staff need every day—clear instructions, prompts, praise, and data collection.

02

What they found

Every staff member hit mastery by the end of the single day. When they used the new skills, their students learned more, too.

The brief package worked without long workshops or college credits.

03

How this fits with other research

Day-Watkins et al. (2018) and Early et al. (2012) later swapped the classroom for short voice-over videos and still saw strong fidelity. Their updates show you can trim the live lecture and keep the payoff.

Randell et al. (2007) replaced people with a computer kid. Tutors who trained on the DTkid simulator learned discrete-trial basics just as well, proving tech can stand in when staff are short on time.

Lattimore et al. (2006) flipped the lens: instead of training staff, they used BST drills to teach workers with autism new job tasks. Together the papers form a chain—BST works for both sides of the teaching equation.

04

Why it matters

You now have options. Run the classic one-day live workshop, email a 10-minute video, or assign a computer module. Pick the format that fits your budget and still get solid staff performance. Start Monday by carving out one hour for practice plus feedback—mastery can follow.

FREE CEUs

Get CEUs on This Topic — Free

The ABA Clubhouse has 60+ on-demand CEUs including ethics, supervision, and clinical topics like this one. Plus a new live CEU every Wednesday.

60+ on-demand CEUs (ethics, supervision, general)
New live CEU every Wednesday
Community of 500+ BCBAs
100% free to join
Join The ABA Clubhouse — Free →
→ Action — try this Monday

Schedule one hour: show a two-minute demo clip, have staff practice three trials with a learner, give instant feedback—repeat until fluent.

02At a glance

Intervention
behavioral skills training
Design
case series
Sample size
24
Population
intellectual disability
Finding
positive

03Original abstract

Shortcomings in the technology for training support staff in methods of teaching people with severe disabilities recently have resulted in calls to improve the technology. We evaluated a program for training basic teaching skills within one day. The program entailed classroom-based verbal and video instruction, practice, and feedback followed by on-the-job feedback. In Study I, four undergraduate interns participated in the program, and all four met the mastery criterion for teaching skills. Three teacher aides participated in Study 2, with results indicating that when the staff applied their newly acquired teaching skills, students with profound disabilities made progress in skill acquisition. Clinical replications occurred in Study 3, involving 17 staff in school classrooms, group homes, and an institution. Results of Studies 2 and 3 also indicated staff were accepting of the program and improved their verbal skills. Results are discussed regarding advantages of training staff in one day. Future research suggestions are offered, focusing on identifying means of rapidly training other teaching skills in order to develop the most effective, acceptable, and efficient technology for staff training.

Research in developmental disabilities, 1996 · doi:10.1016/s0891-4222(96)00031-5