Interventions aimed at increasing knowledge and improving attitudes towards people with intellectual disabilities among lay people.
Real contact plus education—led partly by people with ID themselves—lifts lay attitudes, but only if you measure with care.
01Research in Context
What this study did
Jameel et al. (2014) read 22 papers that tried to change how everyday people feel about individuals with intellectual disability. They looked for classes, videos, or meet-ups that made attitudes kinder. The team did not run a new experiment; they simply stitched together what others had tried.
What they found
Two things rose to the top: teach facts and give real contact. The strongest programs let people with ID co-teach the session. Yet most studies used weak surveys, so the authors urge better measures before anyone claims victory.
How this fits with other research
Perez et al. (2015) asked 550 adults the same question and proved quality beats quantity: one close friendship lowers prejudice more than many quick hellos. Erickson et al. (2016) echo the point—closeness, not just contact, trims stigma. Laugeson et al. (2014) narrows the lens to medical students and finds the same fog: lectures help a little, but sloppy tools hide the real score. Together these papers extend Leila’s call and add sharper yardsticks you can use today.
Why it matters
When you plan staff orientation or parent workshops, pair brief teaching with guided hang-outs—lunch buddies, shared art, or co-led tours. Invite individuals with ID to speak first; their voice is the active ingredient. Track attitude change with a validated scale, not a home-made smile sheet, so you know the training truly works.
Want CEUs on This Topic?
The ABA Clubhouse has 60+ free CEUs — live every Wednesday. Ethics, supervision & clinical topics.
Join Free →Swap one lecture slide for a 10-minute story told by a client about their own life and hobbies.
02At a glance
03Original abstract
Despite policies aimed at ensuring equal rights and maximising respect and social inclusion for people with intellectual disabilities, in their daily lives many continue to face negative attitudes and discrimination within society. Misconceptions about what it means to have an intellectual disability and about the capabilities of people with intellectual disabilities appear widespread, and may contribute to prejudice and discrimination. This review provides a summary and evaluation of empirical interventions aimed at increasing knowledge and targeting negative attitudes towards this population among lay people of working age. An electronic search using PsycINFO, Web of Science and PubMed identified 22 English language studies published between 1990 and early 2014 that reported a specific intervention with a lay population sample. The majority of studies reported promising outcomes, particularly those aimed at increasing knowledge of intellectual disability through education. Support for the positive influence of contact with people with intellectual disabilities was demonstrated across several interventions. Interventions delivered at least partly by individuals with intellectual disabilities, and educational interventions appear to hold the most promise. The evidence is limited though by the weaknesses of measurement tools employed.
Research in developmental disabilities, 2014 · doi:10.1016/j.ridd.2014.07.028