Going 'above and beyond': are those high in autistic traits less pro-social?
College students with high autistic traits offer fewer helping behaviors and feel better choosing self-interest, but targeted groups can reverse the pattern.
01Research in Context
What this study did
Jameel et al. (2014) asked college students to complete questionnaires about autistic traits. Then they watched how often each student offered help or shared in two short lab games. They also asked students how good or bad each choice felt to them.
The team compared students who scored high on autistic traits with those who scored low. No one got training or coaching; the study simply watched natural choices.
What they found
Students high in autistic traits came up with fewer kind or helpful moves. When they did pick a self-focused option, they reported feeling more satisfied with that choice than their low-trait peers did.
In plain words, the higher the trait score, the less "pro-social" the behavior and the better self-interest felt.
How this fits with other research
Pahnke et al. (2014) seems to say the opposite. They ran a six-week ACT group with high-functioning teens diagnosed with ASD. After the group, parents saw more pro-social acts, not fewer. The clash disappears when you notice Johan gave training and used diagnosed teens, while Leila watched untrained college students with only high trait scores.
Callanan et al. (2021) keeps the same college-trait sample but shifts the lens. They show that high-trait students who score high on self-compassion have less anxiety and depression. Together the papers map both the social gap (Leila) and a possible internal buffer (John).
Hillier et al. (2018) turn the problem into action. Knowing that autistic university students often struggle socially, they ran a weekly peer-support curriculum. Students felt less lonely and more socially confident. The line from Leila’s snapshot to Ashleigh’s program shows: identify the deficit, then build the support.
Why it matters
If you work with college students, don’t assume a high AQ score means "won’t help." It means "needs structure to see the social payoff." Try adding labeled praise when the student offers a pencil, holds a door, or gives a compliment. Track these moments for a week; you may see the same boost Ashleigh found when support is explicit and peer-based.
Want CEUs on This Topic?
The ABA Clubhouse has 60+ free CEUs — live every Wednesday. Ethics, supervision & clinical topics.
Join Free →Praise and tally every spontaneous pro-social act you see from your high-AQ student for one week; share the count at mid-week to show social behavior pays off.
02At a glance
03Original abstract
Few studies have explored how the cognitive differences associated with autistic spectrum disorder translate into everyday social behaviour. This study investigated pro-social behaviour in students scoring high and low on the autism-spectrum quotient (AQ), using a novel scenario task: 'Above and Beyond'. Each scenario involved an opportunity to behave pro-socially, and thus required balancing the needs of a character against participants' own interests. High AQ participants both generated responses and selected courses of action that were less pro-social than those of the low AQ group. For actions of low pro-social value they gave higher self-satisfaction ratings; conversely, they gave lower self-satisfaction ratings for high pro-social actions. The implications for everyday functioning are considered for those with high autistic traits.
Journal of autism and developmental disorders, 2014 · doi:10.1007/s10803-013-1757-3