Medical students' attitudes towards people with intellectual disabilities: a literature review.
Teaching medical students about intellectual disability can shift attitudes, but current studies are too shaky to bank on.
01Research in Context
What this study did
Laugeson et al. (2014) read every paper they could find on teaching medical students about people with intellectual disabilities. They wanted to know if any lesson plan actually changed student attitudes.
The team looked at studies from many countries. They compared lecture courses, hospital visits, and role-play sessions.
What they found
The review found only weak signs that teaching helps. Most studies had no control group and used home-made attitude quizzes.
The authors say we cannot trust the positive hints until stronger trials are run.
How this fits with other research
Jameel et al. (2014) did the same kind of review but looked at lay adults instead of students. Both papers agree: education plus real contact works best, yet proof is thin.
Repp et al. (1987) showed that short, boss-led training boosts direct-care staff skills. Their how-to tips still apply when you design student workshops today.
Perez et al. (2015) surveyed 550 adults and found quality contact lowers prejudice, while shallow contact can backfire. This warns us that quick hospital shadowing may not be enough; students need real, equal-status interaction.
Why it matters
If you help train future doctors, demand better studies before you adopt a package. For now, copy the strongest parts: small groups, people with ID co-teaching, and repeated, high-quality contact. Track attitude scores with a validated tool so your data can finally strengthen the evidence base.
Want CEUs on This Topic?
The ABA Clubhouse has 60+ free CEUs — live every Wednesday. Ethics, supervision & clinical topics.
Join Free →Invite an adult with ID to co-lead your next student workshop instead of doing the lecture yourself.
02At a glance
03Original abstract
The present paper provides a review of research on medical students' attitudes to people with intellectual disabilities. The attitudes of medical students warrant empirical attention because their future work may determine people with intellectual disabilities' access to healthcare and exposure to health inequalities. An electronic search of Embase, Ovid MEDLINE(R), PsycINFO, Scopus, and Web of Science was completed to identify papers published up to August 2013. Twenty-four studies were identified, most of which evaluated the effects of pedagogical interventions on students' attitudes. Results suggested that medical students' attitudes to people with intellectual disabilities were responsive to interventions. However, the evidence is restricted due to research limitations, including poor measurement, self-selection bias, and the absence of control groups when evaluating interventions. Thus, there is a dearth of high-quality research on this topic, and past findings should be interpreted with caution. Future research directions are provided.
Research in developmental disabilities, 2014 · doi:10.1016/j.ridd.2014.05.019