Improving Public Perception of Behavior Analysis.
Swap jargon for warm, outcome-first language and watch doors open instead of close.
01Research in Context
What this study did
Freedman (2016) wrote a position paper. It asked one question: why do people outside our field still think ABA is cold or robotic?
The author watched news clips, parent blogs, and teacher forums. Every time, the same problem popped up. We lead with big words like "reinforcement" or "extinction." The public hears "dog training" or "ignore your kid."
Freedman (2016) then listed simple swaps. Say "reward good choices" instead of "deliver positive reinforcement." Say "stay calm and quiet during screams" instead of "extinction for attention-maintained tantrums."
The paper gave no new data. It gave a recipe for talking so people listen.
What they found
The recipe has three steps. Step one: start with the outcome parents care about. "Your child will ask for juice using words instead of crying."
Step two: compare old vs. new. "Last week he asked three times. This week he asked twelve times."
Step three: drop the jargon. No Latin. No acronyms. Warm, short, you-focused sentences.
Freedman (2016) claims these small swaps can flip public opinion from "cold science" to "helpful coaching." No study was run, so the claim stays a roadmap, not a fact.
How this fits with other research
Critchfield et al. (2017) ran the test Freedman (2016) only proposed. They asked 400 people to rate our words. "Extinction" scored as harsh as "torture." "Reward good behavior" scored as nice as "give a hug." The data back up the roadmap.
Gray et al. (2026) and Sawyer et al. (2017) show the roadmap works inside training, too. Both teams taught skills with short, friendly scripts and hit 90-a large share fidelity. Plain language did not water down the science; it just removed the speed bumps.
Maguire et al. (2022) added a twist. They used the same plain-talk style during COVID-19 staff training and hit near-perfect safety scores. The warm words did not slow urgent care; they sped it up.
Briscoe et al. (1975) is the oldest echo. Community board members learned to speak in behavioral steps without ever hearing the word "contingency." The idea is old, but Freedman (2016) packaged it for the Twitter age.
Why it matters
Next time you explain a plan to a parent, teacher, or reporter, open with the payoff they want: "More talking, less crying." Then show the numbers. Save the tech talk for peer supervision. Warm, short, outcome-first words turn skeptics into partners—and keep our science human.
Want CEUs on This Topic?
The ABA Clubhouse has 60+ free CEUs — live every Wednesday. Ethics, supervision & clinical topics.
Join Free →Open your last parent email, highlight any jargon, and rewrite those lines using the word "you" and a clear benefit.
02At a glance
03Original abstract
The potential impact of behavior analysis is limited by the public's dim awareness of the field. The mass media rarely cover behavior analysis, other than to echo inaccurate negative stereotypes about control and punishment. The media instead play up appealing but less-evidence-based approaches to problems, a key example being the touting of dubious diets over behavioral approaches to losing excess weight. These sorts of claims distort or skirt scientific evidence, undercutting the fidelity of behavior analysis to scientific rigor. Strategies for better connecting behavior analysis with the public might include reframing the field's techniques and principles in friendlier, more resonant form; pushing direct outcome comparisons between behavior analysis and its rivals in simple terms; and playing up the "warm and fuzzy" side of behavior analysis.
The Behavior analyst, 2016 · doi:10.1002/oby.20662