Practitioner Development

Effects of a reviewer-prompting strategy on timely manuscript reviews.

Caruso et al. (2004) · Journal of applied behavior analysis 2004
★ The Verdict

A polite e-mail nudge boosts reviewer on-time returns—use it when deadlines slip.

✓ Read this if BCBAs who manage adult staff, parent paperwork, or inter-agency deadlines.
✗ Skip if Clinicians who only work hands-on with clients and never send reminders.

01Research in Context

01

What this study did

Mary et al. (2004) tested a short e-mail reminder to journal reviewers.

Each message named the manuscript, gave the due date, and added a friendly line.

The team tracked how many reviews came back on time before and after the prompt.

02

What they found

The polite e-mail raised the share of on-time reviews.

More reviewers met the deadline when they got the nudge.

03

How this fits with other research

Byrd (1980) mailed a single letter to college professors. The note asked them to turn off classroom lights. Energy waste dropped up to 30 percent.

Critchfield (1996) taped signs inside campus restrooms. The signs cut graffiti to zero for three months.

Bigby et al. (2009) slipped "Click It or Ticket" flyers under windshield wipers. Seat-belt use rose 20 points.

All four studies show the same cheap tool: a brief written prompt lifts adult compliance in real-world settings.

04

Why it matters

You can borrow the same one-sentence nudge in your own work. E-mail a supervisee the task name, due date, and a kind word. Post a sign on the data-sheet clip-board. Slip a note into a parent folder. These tiny prompts cost nothing yet keep deadlines, forms, and safety rules on track.

Free CEUs

Want CEUs on This Topic?

The ABA Clubhouse has 60+ free CEUs — live every Wednesday. Ethics, supervision & clinical topics.

Join Free →
→ Action — try this Monday

Add one line to your next reminder e-mail: task name, due date, and a friendly thank-you.

02At a glance

Intervention
other
Design
single case other
Finding
positive

03Original abstract

We studied a reviewer-prompting system designed to improve the timeliness of journal reviews. The prompting system consisted of an e-mail message sent individually to reviewers noting the manuscript number, review due date, and associated social amenities for the timely completion of the task. Our results indicated that the prompting system increased timely reviews.

Journal of applied behavior analysis, 2004 · doi:10.1901/jaba.2004.37-523