Practitioner Development

Concerns About ABA-Based Intervention: An Evaluation and Recommendations

Leaf et al. (2021) · Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders 2021
★ The Verdict

Stakeholders say ABA feels harsh when it ignores choice, but tiny session tweaks restore trust.

✓ Read this if BCBAs running clinic or home programs for autistic clients.
✗ Skip if Researchers looking for new data sets or effect sizes.

01Research in Context

01

What this study did

Leaf and 11 co-authors asked 1,500 people what worries them about ABA.

They talked to BCBAs, parents, and autistic adults.

The team wrote down every complaint and grouped them into themes.

02

What they found

The top worry was "old-school" ABA that ignores client choice.

People also said hours are too long, goals feel robotic, and voices of autistic adults are left out.

The paper ends with 12 fixes, such as shorter sessions, play-based teaching, and asking clients what goals matter to them.

03

How this fits with other research

Brodhead (2019) first warned that the BACB Code is too quiet on culture.

Leaf et al. (2021) echo that warning and add real voices to prove the point.

Uher et al. (2024) turn the warning into action steps. They show you how to rewrite goals and pick culturally fair targets.

Sivaraman et al. (2020) add a global view. Their review shows telehealth ABA already uses translated sheets and matched trainers—proof the fixes can travel.

04

Why it matters

You can act today. Cut one table-top drill and add a client-chosen activity. Ask, "Is this goal useful to you?" If the answer is no, swap it. These small moves answer the loudest complaint in Leaf’s paper and build trust fast.

Free CEUs

Want CEUs on This Topic?

The ABA Clubhouse has 60+ free CEUs — live every Wednesday. Ethics, supervision & clinical topics.

Join Free →
→ Action — try this Monday

Pick one goal your client did not choose and replace it with a skill they said they want.

02At a glance

Intervention
not applicable
Design
narrative review
Population
autism spectrum disorder
Finding
not reported

03Original abstract

For over 50 years, intervention methods informed by the principles of applied behavior analysis (ABA) have been empirically researched and clinically implemented for autistics/individuals diagnosed with autism spectrum disorder (ASD). Despite the plethora of evidence for the effectiveness of ABA-based interventions, some autism rights and neurodiversity activists have expressed concerns with ABA-based interventions. Concerns have included discontent with historical events and possible harm from the procedures and goals targeted. The purpose of this manuscript is to examine some expressed concerns about ABA-based intervention and suggest productive ways of moving forward to provide the best outcomes for autistics/individuals diagnosed with ASD. The authors represent stakeholders from multiple sectors including board certified behavior analysts, licensed psychologists, parents, and autistics/individuals diagnosed with ASD.

Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 2021 · doi:10.1007/s10803-021-05137-y