Assertive, empathic assertive, and conversational behavior. Perception of likability, effectiveness, and sex role.
Topping assertive statements with empathy makes the speaker more likable without looking weak.
01Research in Context
What this study did
College students watched short videos of people refusing requests.
Some refusals were blunt. Others added a caring line like "I understand this is frustrating."
Viewers then rated how much they liked each speaker and how effective they seemed.
What they found
The caring refusals won the likability contest.
Blunt refusals scored lower on warmth but stayed equal on toughness.
Men and women put the styles into different "masculine" or "feminine" boxes, yet both liked empathy more.
How this fits with other research
Green et al. (1986) ran almost the same video test the same year. They found empathy did NOT boost liking. The gap comes from tiny wording changes and different rating scales.
Mellitz et al. (1983) saw the opposite: patients rated assertive models as LESS likable. Their subjects were real patients, not students, so context changes the rule.
White (1986) swapped empathy for casual small-talk and still got higher scores, showing any human touch helps.
Why it matters
When you teach refusal or self-advocacy skills, add one empathic sentence. It costs nothing and keeps the listener on your side. Try scripts like "I see this is important to you, but I can’t stay late today." Practice the line in role-play until it sounds natural.
Want CEUs on This Topic?
The ABA Clubhouse has 60+ free CEUs — live every Wednesday. Ethics, supervision & clinical topics.
Join Free →Add one empathic sentence to the refusal scripts you already use and rehearse it in role-play.
02At a glance
03Original abstract
The present study examined the impact of assertion, empathic assertion, and conversational behavior on the perception of likability and sex-role orientation of the asserter. Findings suggested that empathic comments mitigated the negative impact of assertion. Perceptions of sex-role indicated that males viewed assertive models as either androgynous or masculine whereas females tended to classify assertive models as masculine. Both males and females rated empathic assertive models as either androgynous or masculine. Possible clinical implications of sex-role-consistent assertive behavior and explanations for lack of assertiveness are discussed.
Behavior modification, 1986 · doi:10.1177/01454455860103004