Practitioner Development

Application of a Pyramidal Training Model on the Implementation of Trial-Based Functional Analysis: a Partial Replication

Alnemary et al. (2017) · Behavior Analysis in Practice 2017
★ The Verdict

Train your BCs first in a group, then have each BC train one BT individually—this pyramidal approach gets accurate TBFA implementation with fewer trainer hours.

✓ Read this if BCBAs who supervise teams and want to cut training time while keeping TBFA fidelity high.
✗ Skip if Practitioners who already use fully automated TBFA packages and see no need for live coaching.

01Research in Context

01

What this study did

Alnemary and team tested a pyramid-style way to teach trial-based functional analysis. First, a trainer taught a small group of behavioral consultants together. Then each consultant taught one behavior tech one-on-one.

The researchers used a multiple-baseline design across people. They checked if the consultants and techs could run TBFA steps correctly in pretend sessions and with a new, untrained behavior.

02

What they found

Everyone learned to carry out TBFA with high accuracy. Skills held up when they switched to a brand-new behavior, showing the training stuck.

The pyramid plan worked: one trainer prepared several consultants, and those consultants passed the skill on without losing quality.

03

How this fits with other research

Standish et al. (2023) went further by cutting out live trainers. They gave parents a mostly automated online package and still reached high TBFA fidelity at home. Their result extends Alnemary’s work from clinic to couch and from staff to families.

Pettingell et al. (2022) also dropped live coaching. A one-hour computer module trained school staff to run TBFAs. Together, these studies show you can keep accuracy while saving trainer hours—either through pyramids or through screens.

McGeown et al. (2013) gives a warning. When they compared computer-only training to live BST for teaching discrete trials, live BST won on accuracy and durability. Alnemary’s model keeps that human layer, so it aligns with the lesson that some in-person practice still pays off.

04

Why it matters

You can stretch supervisor time without hurting quality. Train your senior staff together, then have each senior train one junior. You will get accurate TBFA implementation and free up your calendar for other tasks.

Free CEUs

Want CEUs on This Topic?

The ABA Clubhouse has 60+ free CEUs — live every Wednesday. Ethics, supervision & clinical topics.

Join Free →
→ Action — try this Monday

Pick one senior staff member, run a 30-minute group TBFA rehearsal, then have that person coach a junior tech in the next case.

02At a glance

Intervention
behavioral skills training
Design
multiple baseline across participants
Sample size
8
Population
not specified
Finding
positive

03Original abstract

We employed a pyramidal training model (PTM) to teach staff to correctly implement and collect data for trial-based functional analysis (TBFA) in simulated situations. First, we trained four behavioral consultants (BCs) in a group format, who each trained one behavior technician (BT) in an individual format. We utilized a non-concurrent multiple baseline design to evaluate the effect of the training. During generalization probes, participants implemented TBFA with a novel problem behavior. This study will contribute to the literature on teaching staff how to conduct TBFA. This study demonstrates the application of a two-level PTM. This study illustrates how agencies can utilize the Task Analysis Training Protocol within a PTM to train staff on implementation of TBFA.

Behavior Analysis in Practice, 2017 · doi:10.1007/s40617-016-0159-3