Practitioner Development

A Model for Analyzing Disability Policy.

Turnbull et al. (2017) · Intellectual and developmental disabilities 2017
★ The Verdict

Use the 12-step policy screen to stop bad disability rules before they reach clients.

✓ Read this if BCBAs who sit on policy teams or write agency rules.
✗ Skip if Clinicians who only do direct therapy and never touch policy.

01Research in Context

01

What this study did

Turnbull et al. (2017) built a 12-step checklist. It helps you test any disability policy before you use it.

The steps cover law, money, staff skills, and family voice. The paper gives no data; it is a map, not a study.

02

What they found

The model shows gaps before they hurt clients. If a policy fails any step, you fix it or drop it.

03

How this fits with other research

Anonymous (2017) is the same model in Spanish. Same 12 steps, same order. This is a direct copy, not a new test.

Bao et al. (2017) adds four culture checks to the 12 steps. They ask: Does the policy fit local values? This extends the model, not replaces it.

Matson et al. (2013) came first. They list five traits of modern disability agencies. The 12-step model turns those traits into a day-by-day checklist.

04

Why it matters

Next time your agency writes a new rule, run it through the 12 steps. You will spot legal traps, budget holes, and family pushback before the ink dries.

Free CEUs

Want CEUs on This Topic?

The ABA Clubhouse has 60+ free CEUs — live every Wednesday. Ethics, supervision & clinical topics.

Join Free →
→ Action — try this Monday

Print the 12 steps and test your current behavior plan policy against them.

02At a glance

Intervention
not applicable
Design
theoretical
Population
intellectual disability
Finding
not reported

03Original abstract

This article describes a 12-step model that can be used for policy analysis. The model encompasses policy development, implementation, and evaluation; takes into account structural foundations of policy; addresses both legal formalism and legal realism; demonstrates contextual sensitivity; and addresses application issues and different conceptualizations of IDD.

Intellectual and developmental disabilities, 2017 · doi:10.1352/1934-9556-55.4.223