Autism & Developmental

Mind and body: concepts of human cognition, physiology and false belief in children with autism or typical development.

Peterson (2005) · Journal of autism and developmental disorders 2005
★ The Verdict

Autistic learners can ace biology yet still fail false-belief tasks, so teach perspective-taking on its own.

✓ Read this if BCBAs running social-skills groups for elementary students with ASD.
✗ Skip if Clinicians focused only on daily living or vocational skills.

01Research in Context

01

What this study did

Researchers compared autistic and typical kids on two kinds of questions. One set asked how the body and brain work, like why we breathe. The other set tested false-belief, like where a doll will look for a toy moved while she was away.

Kids were matched by age. The study wanted to see if knowing biology helps with understanding minds.

02

What they found

Autistic kids answered biology questions just as well as their peers. They knew hearts pump blood and brains help us think.

On false-belief tasks, the same autistic kids scored far lower. They could not predict that the doll would look in the old spot. The skills did not rise together; they split apart.

03

How this fits with other research

Grant (1989) first claimed autistic children confuse minds and bodies. Peterson (2005) shows that claim was too broad; biology knowledge can stay intact while false-belief fails.

Bradford et al. (2018) and van der Miesen et al. (2024) later found the same split lasts into adulthood. Autistic adults still track social cues yet fail to predict false beliefs, proving the gap is lifelong.

Boucher (2012) warns clinicians not to over-use false-belief scores. The study backs that warning: passing biology tests does not fix perspective-taking, so we must teach it directly.

04

Why it matters

You can stop drilling body parts once the child knows them. Move time to explicit perspective-taking lessons instead. Use role-play, video modeling, and thought-bubbles to show that people can hold different ideas. Check false-belief skills separately from science facts; they grow on different tracks.

Free CEUs

Want CEUs on This Topic?

The ABA Clubhouse has 60+ free CEUs — live every Wednesday. Ethics, supervision & clinical topics.

Join Free →
→ Action — try this Monday

Add one false-belief trial to your session: hide a toy in a new spot while a puppet 'leaves,' then ask, 'Where will she look first?'

02At a glance

Intervention
not applicable
Design
quasi experimental
Sample size
67
Population
autism spectrum disorder, neurotypical
Finding
mixed

03Original abstract

This study examined theory of mind (ToM) and concepts of human biology (eyes, heart, brain, lungs and mind) in a sample of 67 children, including 25 high functioning children with autism (age 6-13), plus age-matched and preschool comparison groups. Contrary to Baron-Cohen [1989, Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 19(4), 579-600], most children with autism correctly understood the functions of the brain (84%) and the mind (64%). Their explanations were predominantly mentalistic. They outperformed typically developing preschoolers in understanding inner physiological (heart, lungs) and cognitive (brain, mind) systems, and scored as high as age-matched typical children. Yet, in line with much previous ToM research, most children with autism (60%) failed false belief, and their ToM performance was unrelated to their understanding of. human biology. Results were discussed in relation to neurobiological and social-experiential accounts of the ToM deficit in autism.

Journal of autism and developmental disorders, 2005 · doi:10.1007/s10803-005-5039-6