A comparative study of autistic subjects' performance at two levels of visual and cognitive perspective taking.
Autistic learners may master visual perspective-taking yet still struggle with cognitive perspective-taking, so teach these skills separately.
01Research in Context
What this study did
Bailey et al. (1990) gave two kinds of perspective-taking tasks to autistic and neurotypical participants. One task asked, "Can you see what I see?" The other asked, "What do I think?"
The team compared scores to see which skill stayed intact and which broke down.
What they found
Autistic learners matched controls on visual tasks. They could say if another person saw a hidden object.
The same learners failed cognitive tasks. They could not say what another person believed when beliefs differed from facts.
How this fits with other research
Reed (1994) conceptually replicated the gap. Autistic kids still failed classic false-belief stories but passed when cues were steady and predictable. Task design, not ability, tipped the scale.
Doi et al. (2020) seems to contradict the intact visual finding. Adult autistic males showed no automatic "line-of-sight" interference in an eye-tracking test. The clash fades when you note age and task type: T et al. used explicit questions with children; Hirokazu measured fast, unconscious responses in adults.
Weinmann et al. (2023) extends the story into adulthood. Autistic adults could take another view, yet switching between self and other took extra effort. The 1990 cognitive deficit now looks like a speed-bump in flexible self-other control, not a missing module.
Why it matters
Separate visual and cognitive perspective-taking in your lesson plans. Use clear, static props for belief tasks and give extra wait-time for switching views. Do not assume a child who points correctly "knows" what others think; test both levels.
Want CEUs on This Topic?
The ABA Clubhouse has 60+ free CEUs — live every Wednesday. Ethics, supervision & clinical topics.
Join Free →Run a quick visual check ("Which toys can I see?") then a belief check ("Where do I think the toy is?") and score each skill on its own data sheet.
02At a glance
03Original abstract
This study extended previous investigations of autistic subjects' perspective-taking abilities through a within-subjects contrast between two levels each of both visual and cognitive problems with stringent controls against guessing. When compared with normal and mentally retarded subjects', the autistic group's performance supported Baron-Cohen's (1988) hypothesis of a selective deficit for cognitive perspective taking among autistic subjects. Both levels of visual perspective taking demonstrated virtually unimpaired performance for autistic subjects with no significant difference between them and control groups. On the cognitive perspective-taking tasks, however, the performance of the three groups was significantly different, with the vast majority of autistic subjects unable to do even the most basic level of this task. Possible explanations and educational implications were discussed.
Journal of autism and developmental disorders, 1990 · doi:10.1007/BF02216060