Are autistic children "behaviorists"? An examination of their mental-physical and appearance-reality distinctions.
Autistic kids can flunk appearance-reality tasks because of format load, not missing concepts.
01Research in Context
What this study did
The team asked 20 autistic kids, the kids with Down syndrome, and 20 typical preschoolers to sort pictures and answer questions. The tasks tested three skills: telling mental from physical things, knowing brains help you think, and spotting the difference between how something looks and what it really is.
Each child saw objects like a sponge painted like a rock. The adult asked, "Does it look like a rock?" then "Is it really a rock?" Kids had to switch answers to show they knew appearance and reality can clash.
What they found
Autistic children failed twice as often as the other groups. Most said the sponge-rock really was a rock. They also said toys could 'remember' and that brains were just 'stuff in your head' with no job to do.
The gap stayed even when all groups had the same language level. This pointed to an autism-specific problem, not slow development in general.
How this fits with other research
Brown et al. (1994) seemed to disagree at first. They gave autistic kids a shorter, simpler false-belief task and many passed. The twist: when the story is short and the wording is clear, processing load drops and performance rises. The skill is there; the format matters.
Weinmann et al. (2023) later tested adults and found the same pattern grown up. Autistic adults could take another's view, but it took them longer and cost more effort. The 1989 'deficit' looks smaller in adults, yet it never fully disappears.
Smith et al. (2008) added a new piece. They showed high-functioning adults tracked their own actions just fine even while they failed mental-state questions. The trouble is not 'self versus other' in general; it is specifically about minds.
Why it matters
When you ask an autistic learner to 'pretend this pen is a toothbrush,' remember the pen may stay a pen in their mind. Use real items first, then slowly add pretend cues. Keep language short and repeat the reality check: 'It looks like X, but it is still Y.' These small tweaks lower the load and let the concept shine through.
Want CEUs on This Topic?
The ABA Clubhouse has 60+ free CEUs — live every Wednesday. Ethics, supervision & clinical topics.
Join Free →Start pretend play with real objects, label 'looks like/is really,' and keep each trial under 20 seconds.
02At a glance
03Original abstract
This paper continues our earlier investigation of autistic children's deficit in attributing beliefs to others--in their "theory of mind." Three experiments are reported. The first tests the prediction that autistic children will fail to distinguish mental and physical entities. The second tests the prediction that they will also be unaware of the mental function of the brain. The third tests the prediction that they will be unable to take into account their own mental states. This latter prediction was tested using Appearance-Reality (A-R) tasks. All three predictions were supported. Deficits in these areas were not found among mentally handicapped or normal children of the same or lower mental and chronological age, suggesting that they may be autism-specific and independent of general developmental delay. It is argued that autistic children's failure to make A-R distinctions is consistent with Leslie's (1987) metarepresentation theory of autism.
Journal of autism and developmental disorders, 1989 · doi:10.1007/BF02212859