Influence of a Brief Autism Education Intervention on Peer Engagement and Inclusion At Mainstream Day Camps: A Mixed-Methods Pilot Study.
A five-minute peer script that names, explains, and invites more than doubled joint play for autistic campers by the end of the week.
01Research in Context
What this study did
Thompson-Hodgetts et al. (2024) ran a mixed-methods pilot at three mainstream day camps. They gave typical campers a five-minute script about one autistic bunkmate. The script covered the camper's name, why he might act differently, his favorite topics, and quick ways to invite him to play.
Staff read the script aloud on Monday. By Friday the researchers filmed how often the autistic camper and peers played together. A control group got no script.
What they found
Autistic campers whose peers heard the script showed large jumps in joint play by day five. The control campers stayed flat. Counselors and kids both said the script made starting games feel easier and less awkward.
How this fits with other research
The result lines up with Watkins et al. (2019), who also built play around a child's special interests and saw big social gains in preschool. Sandy shortens the idea to a five-minute talk instead of adult-led centers.
It also extends the peer-tutor work from Mueller et al. (2000). That study trained entire kindergarten classes as buddies and doubled social bids. Sandy shows a micro-dose of the same logic works at summer camp.
Sasson et al. (2022) layered video modeling onto peer mediation for older students with autism and intellectual disability. Sandy keeps the peer piece but drops the tech, proving a simple spoken script can still move the needle for a mixed-ability group.
Why it matters
You can copy this script Monday morning. Pick one autistic client, jot four bullet points—name, behavior reason, interests, invitation tips—read it to the group, and cue peers to use the tips during free play. Five minutes of talk can buy a week of richer inclusion with no extra staff or gear.
Want CEUs on This Topic?
The ABA Clubhouse has 60+ free CEUs — live every Wednesday. Ethics, supervision & clinical topics.
Join Free →Write a four-line script about your client, read it to peers before free play, and tally joint engagement at the end of the week.
02At a glance
03Original abstract
To explore the benefits of a brief autism education intervention on peer engagement and inclusion of autistic children at day camps. A convergent, parallel, two-arm (intervention/no intervention), non-randomized, mixed-methods design was used. The individualized, peer-directed, 5-10 min intervention included four components: (1) diagnostic label, (2) description and purpose of unique behaviors, (3) favorite activities and interests, and (4) strategies to engage. A timed-interval behavior-coding system was used to evaluate engagement between each autistic camper and their peers based on videos taken at camp (days 1, 2, 5). Interviews with campers and camp staff explored why changes in targeted outcomes may have occurred. Percent intervals in which the autistic campers were jointly engaged with peers improved in the intervention group (n = 10) and did not change in the control group (n = 5). A large between group intervention effect occurred by day 5 (Z = - 1.942, η2 = 0.29). Interviews (5 autistic campers, 34 peers, 18 staff) done on the last day of camp in the intervention group garnered three themes: (1) Changed behavioral attribution, (2) Knowledge facilitates understanding and engagement, and (3) (Mis)perceptions of increased inclusion. A brief educational intervention that includes individualized explanatory information and strengths-based strategies might improve peers' understanding of and social engagement with autistic children in community programs such as camps.
Journal of autism and developmental disorders, 2024 · doi:10.1080/09638288.2018.1561955