How Extrinsic and Intrinsic Motivation Impact Cognitive Flexibility in Children With Autism.
Use play, not prizes, to teach flexible thinking to autistic preschoolers under four.
01Research in Context
What this study did
Saniee et al. (2025) asked 3- to 7-year-olds to sort pictures by color, then by shape. The task is called the dimensional change card sort. It tests cognitive flexibility.
Some kids played for fun. Others earned stickers. The team compared how well autistic and typical kids did under each motive.
What they found
Autistic preschoolers aged 36-48 months scored higher when the game was just fun. Stickers did not help them.
After age 49 months, stickers started to help. Typical kids did not show this early split.
How this fits with other research
Ingersoll et al. (2003) also saw that the type of reward matters. They used sensory toys and boosted imitation. Sima now shows that internal fun boosts flexibility.
Peisley et al. (2020) embedded rewards in a memory game and saw gains in 5- to 8-year-olds with autism. Sima shows that, for younger kids, fun alone is enough.
Dixon et al. (2008) showed that autistic children learn extra facts just by watching peers. Sima adds that internal drive can unlock flexible thinking without any extra cues.
Why it matters
If you work with preschoolers with autism, start cognitive tasks with play, not prizes. Let them choose colors or make the game silly. Save stickers for kids over four only. This small shift can give you faster set-shifting with fewer rewards.
Want CEUs on This Topic?
The ABA Clubhouse has 60+ free CEUs — live every Wednesday. Ethics, supervision & clinical topics.
Join Free →Run your next sorting game with no stickers—just excited praise and child-led turns.
02At a glance
03Original abstract
PURPOSE: Cognitive flexibility is a key neurocognitive process that is often challenging in children with autism. Recent research has highlighted the potential influence of motivation on cognitive flexibility; however, the impact of different types of motivation (intrinsic vs. extrinsic) on the cognitive flexibility performance of children with autism remains unclear. METHOD: This study aims to investigate the impact of intrinsic and extrinsic motivation on cognitive flexibility in 43 children with autism and 89 typically developing children (TDC) (age range 36-84 months), using the three versions of dimensional change card sorting task (standard, extrinsic reward and intrinsic motivation versions). RESULTS: Results indicate that manipulating cognitive flexibility through motivation can improve performance, particularly in children with autism, with a significant impact of intrinsic motivation on this group. In the age range of 36-48 months, intrinsic motivation enhance accuracy in children with autism but not in TDC. From 49 to 60 months of age, both intrinsic and extrinsic motivation contribute to improved accuracy in children with Autism, with intrinsic motivation having a more significant impact. In TDC, however, only intrinsic motivation is associated with enhanced accuracy. In older children, both intrinsic and extrinsic motivation enhance performance in both groups, suggesting the maturation of cognitive systems. This evidence suggests that, in children with autism, the impact of motivation emerges at an earlier age than in typically developing children. Notably, intrinsic motivation has a more significant and profound effect at a younger age compared to extrinsic rewards. CONCLUSION: The study provides insights into the developmental trajectory of cognitive flexibility in children with autism and highlights the significance of leveraging motivation to enhance this essential cognitive function.
Journal of autism and developmental disorders, 2025 · doi:10.1016/j.paid.2019.01.016