Generalization from school to home with autistic children.
Train the same verbal answers in several school places and the skill is more likely to show up at home.
01Research in Context
What this study did
Handleman et al. (1980) compared two ways to teach autistic children to answer common questions like “What’s your name?”
One group practiced only at a classroom table. The other group practiced at the table, in the hall, in the gym, and in the office.
The team then watched who could still answer the same questions at home without extra teaching.
What they found
Kids who trained in many school spots carried the skill home better than kids who stayed in one spot.
The single-spot group mostly stayed quiet at home, even though they had answered fine at school.
How this fits with other research
Eshkevari (1979) ran almost the same study one year earlier and got the same result, so the 1980 paper is a clean replication with new kids.
Anderson (2001) later showed that training with many different WH-questions also helps answers travel across people and rooms. The two ideas pair well: move around the building AND rotate the questions.
Carr et al. (1985) found that casual, real-moment teaching beat rigid drills for preposition use. That seems to clash with S et al.’s tight table sessions, but the 1985 study kept kids in one corner. S et al. prove you can keep the drill format and still win—just change the scenery.
Why it matters
You don’t need new programs or extra staff. Take the child on a short walk while you run the same flash-card set in two or three spots. That tiny tweak can turn “school only” language into “works everywhere” language, saving you from re-teaching at home or in the community.
Want CEUs on This Topic?
The ABA Clubhouse has 60+ free CEUs — live every Wednesday. Ethics, supervision & clinical topics.
Join Free →Pick two new spots in the building and run today’s question set in each one before lunch.
02At a glance
03Original abstract
This investigation assessed the generalization of verbal behavior from school to home with three autistic boys. The study attempted to expand upon previous research by Handleman (1979) by analyzing the effects of single versus multiple trainers on generalization. By the use of a multiple-baseline design counterbalanced for treatment condition, the three youngsters were taught responses to common questions in two school settings and were probed to determine transfer of learning to their homes. All three children demonstrated greater generalization when they received training at varied locations as opposed to instruction in a single setting. Results of the study suggest that manipulating the school environment to more closely simulate home conditions may facilitate transfer of treatment gains to the natural setting.
Journal of autism and developmental disorders, 1980 · doi:10.1007/BF02408291