Autism & Developmental

A Driver Training Program Intervention for Student Drivers with Autism Spectrum Disorder: A Multi-site Randomised Controlled Trial.

Vindin et al. (2021) · Journal of autism and developmental disorders 2021
★ The Verdict

A fancy autism-tailored driving course did no better than standard lessons.

✓ Read this if BCBAs helping teens or adults with autism learn to drive.
✗ Skip if Clinicians focused on social or job skills only.

01Research in Context

01

What this study did

Vindin et al. (2021) ran a multi-site randomized trial with autistic student drivers. Half got a new 10-lesson driving course. The other half got regular driving lessons.

Both groups practiced on real roads with certified instructors. The study tracked lane control, speed, and hazard response.

02

What they found

Both groups improved their driving scores. The special program did not beat the standard lessons.

In plain words: extra autism-specific drills added no clear value over plain old driver's ed.

03

How this fits with other research

Berry-Kravis et al. (2010) showed autistic adults miss more pedestrian hazards and react slower. That lab finding sparked the idea for extra hazard training.

Saré et al. (2020) and Johnson et al. (2009) both found behavioral-skills training works for social and job skills. Yet here the same training style did not help driving.

The pattern: BST boosts social and daily-living skills, but driving skills may need a different recipe.

04

Why it matters

If you teach life skills, do not assume a slick manual beats plain practice. For driving, stick to evidence-based driver’s ed and add extra hazard drills only if data show a gain. Save your program hours for skills that truly need a custom curriculum.

Free CEUs

Want CEUs on This Topic?

The ABA Clubhouse has 60+ free CEUs — live every Wednesday. Ethics, supervision & clinical topics.

Join Free →
→ Action — try this Monday

Use regular driver’s ed and add brief hazard-spotting drills if needed.

02At a glance

Intervention
behavioral skills training
Design
randomized controlled trial
Sample size
72
Population
autism spectrum disorder
Finding
null

03Original abstract

The purpose of this multi-site randomised controlled trial was to evaluate the effectiveness of a Driving Training Program, an intervention designed for student drivers with autism spectrum disorder (ASD). Participants were 72 student drivers with ASD (ages 16-31) who were randomly assigned to an intervention or control group. Student drivers received ten driving lessons with a professional driving instructor via a standardised driving route. The Driving Performance Checklist was used as the outcome measure to evaluate the driving performance of student drivers during on-road pre- and post-observational drives. Both groups showed an improvement in driving performance, however, the extent of improvement between groups was not significant. Findings showed promising intervention efficacy for training student drivers with ASD to drive.

Journal of autism and developmental disorders, 2021 · doi:10.1136/injuryprev-2014-041212