Performance of autistic and control subjects on three cognitive perspective-taking tasks.
Use clear, unmoving props to teach perspective-taking before you try fast-changing social stories.
01Research in Context
What this study did
The team gave three perspective-taking games to autistic kids and same-age peers. One game was the classic Sally-Anne task where a doll moves a marble while another doll watches.
The other two games used clear, unmoving props like colored blocks. Kids had to say what the other person could see or believe.
What they found
Autistic kids failed the Sally-Anne story but passed the block tasks. The difference was the cues: blocks stayed put, the story kept changing.
Same children, same skill, different results. Task design, not ability, decided the score.
How this fits with other research
Bailey et al. (1990) saw the same split four years earlier: autistic kids passed visual tasks yet bombed belief tasks. Together the two papers show the gap is stable.
Peterson (2005) adds another layer: high-functioning autistic kids understood how brains work yet still missed false beliefs. Knowing biology does not fix perspective-taking.
van der Miesen et al. (2024) looks like a contradiction at first. Autistic adults watched social cues but still failed spontaneous belief tests. The adult study removed all extra hints, while the 1994 study added stable props. Same population, opposite supports — that explains the different outcomes.
Why it matters
Stop blaming the child when a perspective task flops. Swap stories with moving parts for setups that give steady visual cues: photos, objects, or written prompts. Start with static materials, then fade them once the learner is solid. You will get clearer data and fewer false negatives.
Want CEUs on This Topic?
The ABA Clubhouse has 60+ free CEUs — live every Wednesday. Ethics, supervision & clinical topics.
Join Free →Replace your Sally-Anne doll story with a photo strip that keeps the object in view and try again.
02At a glance
03Original abstract
One explanation for the persistent social disabilities of individuals with autism is based on the nature of social stimuli, being transient, complex and very difficult to predict. It was suggested that autistic people's performance on cognitive perspective-taking tasks (a measure of understanding of other people) would be enhanced with increased predictability and reduced transience of stimulus materials. Thus autistic and control subjects were tested on Baron-Cohen, Leslie, and Frith's (1985) "Sally/Anne" task and on two other perspective-taking tasks that involved more predictable interactions and nontransient cues. Autistic subjects differed significantly from the control subjects in their ability to perform Baron-Cohen's task but not the other tasks. As well the autistic subjects performed significantly differently on the two types of tasks. Failure of the autistic subjects on the Sally/Anne task with their concurrent success on the other tasks can best be attributed to the nontransient nature of the stimuli used and the predictability of the protagonists' reactions in the two tasks on which they succeeded.
Journal of autism and developmental disorders, 1994 · doi:10.1007/BF02172212