Assessment & Research

Self-determination skills and opportunities of adolescents with severe intellectual and developmental disabilities.

Carter et al. (2009) · American journal on intellectual and developmental disabilities 2009
★ The Verdict

Teachers see teens with severe ID as having little self-determination, but parents see more, and teens see even more—so always ask everyone.

✓ Read this if BCBAs writing transition plans for middle and high school students with severe intellectual disability.
✗ Skip if BCBAs working with verbal adults or mild ID only.

01Research in Context

01

What this study did

Gardner et al. (2009) asked the teachers and 41 parents about teens with severe intellectual disability.

They used simple rating scales to measure three things: what the teens knew about making choices, what they could actually do, and how sure they felt about it.

The teens were 12-18 years old and attended special-education schools.

02

What they found

Teachers said the teens had very little self-determination skill.

Parents agreed opportunities existed at home and school, but they rated their children's abilities higher than teachers did.

Both groups saw the same world, yet they scored the same kids differently.

03

How this fits with other research

Berástegui et al. (2021) extends this work by adding the teens' own voices. When youth with ID rated themselves, they scored their self-determination higher than both parents and teachers.

DiStefano et al. (2020) explains why these gaps happen. Standard tests often floor-out for severe ID, so low scores may reflect test limits, not true ability.

Cryan et al. (1996) reminds us that choice-making itself is possible for this group. Their review shows people with severe disabilities can learn to pick preferred items when tasks are adapted.

04

Why it matters

Before you write low self-determination goals, collect at least three views: teen, parent, and teacher. Use simple choice probes and real tasks like picking lunch or leisure items. If scores clash, adapt the assessment before you adapt the student.

Free CEUs

Want CEUs on This Topic?

The ABA Clubhouse has 60+ free CEUs — live every Wednesday. Ethics, supervision & clinical topics.

Join Free →
→ Action — try this Monday

Add a 5-minute choice probe to your next session: offer two reinforcers and let the student pick—then ask parent and teacher to predict the choice.

02At a glance

Intervention
not applicable
Design
survey
Sample size
135
Population
intellectual disability, developmental delay
Finding
not reported

03Original abstract

We asked teachers and parents to assess the self-determination prospects of 135 youth with severe intellectual and developmental disabilities. Teachers typically reported that youth evidenced limited knowledge about self-determined behavior, ability to perform these behaviors, and confidence regarding the efficacy of their self-determination efforts. Parents and teachers diverged in their evaluations of the self-determination capacities of youth but agreed that opportunities to engage in self-determined behavior were available both at school and home. Although social skill and problem behavior ratings both were significant predictors of teachers' ratings of students' self-determination capacity, opportunities at school, opportunities at home, and problem behaviors were negatively correlated with ratings of students' self-determination capacities and opportunities.

American journal on intellectual and developmental disabilities, 2009 · doi:10.1352/1944-7558-114.3.179