Assessment & Research

Psychological adjustment of young subjects with Möbius sequence and their primary caregivers' strain and life satisfaction: First longitudinal data.

Briegel et al. (2019) · Research in developmental disabilities 2019
★ The Verdict

Kids with Möbius sequence show lasting emotional-behavioral problems, and their parents’ strain holds steady for years.

✓ Read this if BCBAs working with youth who have Möbius sequence or other rare facial-motor disorders.
✗ Skip if Clinicians only treating typically developing clients or acute post-surgical cases.

01Research in Context

01

What this study did

Briegel et al. (2019) followed youth with Möbius sequence and their main caregivers for four years. They used the Child Behavior Checklist to track kids’ psychological adjustment and asked parents about strain and life satisfaction.

The study had no control group. It simply compared scores to general population norms at two time points.

02

What they found

Kids with Möbius sequence scored above average on almost every CBCL scale at both checks. Their caregivers reported typical strain and life satisfaction, and these parent scores did not change over the four years.

In short, the children showed broad emotional and behavioral issues, while parents stayed consistently stressed but stable.

03

How this fits with other research

Briegel (2012) saw the same pattern: parents noted more social and emotional problems than the kids themselves reported. The new study extends that snapshot by showing the problems persist for years.

Strobel et al. (2016) also found poor social quality of life in children with Moebius syndrome, giving a second independent signal that social deficits are central.

Adams et al. (2018) tracked moms of kids with other rare syndromes and saw stress stay flat, just like the Möbius parents. Together these studies suggest chronic but stable caregiver strain is common across rare disabilities, not just Möbius.

04

Why it matters

If you serve a child with Möbius sequence, screen for wide-ranging adjustment problems, not just facial-motor needs. Plan for long-term social-skills support and keep checking parent stress; it probably will not fade on its own. Referrals for respite or counseling may be needed from the start rather than waiting for a crisis.

Free CEUs

Want CEUs on This Topic?

The ABA Clubhouse has 60+ free CEUs — live every Wednesday. Ethics, supervision & clinical topics.

Join Free →
→ Action — try this Monday

Add the CBCL and a brief parent-strain survey to your intake packet for any new Möbius client.

02At a glance

Intervention
not applicable
Design
pre post no control
Sample size
26
Population
other
Finding
negative

03Original abstract

AIMS/METHODS: At present, there is no information about the course of psychological adjustment in young subjects with Möbius sequence (MS) and their parents' strain and life satisfaction. To fill this gap, we performed a four-year follow-up study. Parents were anonymously asked to fill out the Child Behavior Checklist 4-18 [CBCL/ 4-18] or the Young Adult Behavior Checklist 18-30 [YABCL/ 18-30] and the Freiburger Personality Inventory-Revised [FPI-R], subscales strain and life satisfaction. RESULTS: 12 males and 14 females (mean: 15.20 years, standard deviation: 3.48 years) could be included in the follow-up (response rate: 83.9%).Compared to the general population, subjects with MS showed significantly higher scores on almost all CBCL scales (exception: externalizing problems) at T1 and T2. At both study times, parental strain and life satisfaction were not significantly different from findings in the general population. No significant longitudinal changes could be found for CBLC scales, parental strain and life satisfaction. CONCLUSIONS: Problems with psychological adjustment seem to be frequent among younger subjects with MS. Therefore, careful monitoring as well as early and adequate interventions, if indicated, are crucial for subjects with MS, not only with regard to somatic complaints but also to aspects of adjustment.

Research in developmental disabilities, 2019 · doi:10.1016/j.ridd.2018.11.004