Moral dilemmas film task: A study of spontaneous narratives by individuals with autism spectrum conditions.
Adults with autism tell shorter, less mentalistic stories about moral clips, but stronger verbal skills help them close the gap.
01Research in Context
What this study did
The team showed short moral-dilemma film clips to adults with autism and to neurotypical adults.
Each person then told a spontaneous story about what happened and why.
The researchers counted how long the stories were and how many mental-state words (think, feel, believe) each person used.
What they found
The autism group told shorter stories and used fewer mental-state words.
Higher verbal IQ helped only the autism group add more mental-state language.
Neurotypical adults kept the same mental-state level no matter their IQ.
How this fits with other research
Shulman et al. (2012) saw the same pattern with school-yard vignettes, so the result holds across films and written stories.
Schaller et al. (2019) extended the idea: when dilemmas involve close relationships, adults with ASD still diverge, showing the gap is social, not just verbal.
Perrot et al. (2021) found the same shortage of mental-state language when autistic adults described themselves and others, proving the issue appears even without moral content.
Why it matters
When you ask a client to explain a social scene, expect shorter, less mentalistic answers.
Boost verbal comprehension first for mild-ASD learners; teach explicit mental-state vocabulary for moderate-ASD learners.
Use visual supports or role-play to practice "think" and "feel" words until they show up naturally in their own stories.
Get CEUs on This Topic — Free
The ABA Clubhouse has 60+ on-demand CEUs including ethics, supervision, and clinical topics like this one. Plus a new live CEU every Wednesday.
After a social video, prompt: "What might he be thinking?" and write the mental-state words on a visual card for the client to use in their retell.
02At a glance
03Original abstract
People with autism spectrum conditions (ASC) have difficulties with mentalizing, empathy, and narrative comprehension. A new test of social and narrative cognition, the Moral Dilemmas Film Task, was developed to probe individuals' spontaneous understanding of naturalistic film scenes. Twenty-eight individuals with ASC and 28 neurotypical controls, matched for age, sex, and IQ, watched four short emotionally charged film clips each depicting a moral dilemma, and were asked to write about what they had seen. Individuals with ASC produced significantly shorter film-based narratives and showed a smaller bias for mental states over objects in their narratives than controls. A significant correlation was found between verbal IQ and the level of mentalizing in film narratives for the ASC group, but not the control group, while the reverse pattern was found with a measure of self-reported cognitive and affective empathy. These results suggest that to the extent that both groups succeed in viewing moral dilemmas in terms of mental content, they do so in different ways, with individuals with ASC using verbal scaffolding to increase their ability to draw meaning from social scenes. The well-established empathy deficit in ASC extends to spontaneous interpretation of moral dilemmas. This new film task has the potential to assay different aspects of how the social world is represented differently in ASC, including during moral comprehension.
Autism research : official journal of the International Society for Autism Research, 2009 · doi:10.1002/aur.79