Assessment & Research

Eye-tracking study on facial emotion recognition tasks in individuals with high-functioning autism spectrum disorders.

Tsang (2018) · Autism : the international journal of research and practice 2018
★ The Verdict

High-functioning clients with autism scan faces like a checklist and overrate hidden emotions—give them eye-first rules and intensity anchors.

✓ Read this if BCBAs teaching social skills to verbal teens or adults with ASD.
✗ Skip if Clinicians serving non-speaking or very young children.

01Research in Context

01

What this study did

Tsang (2018) watched where high-functioning adults with autism looked while they judged faces.

The faces showed tricky emotions like fear and mixed feelings.

An eye-tracking camera mapped every glance to see if scanning was rule-bound or flexible.

02

What they found

The HF-ASD group used a rigid, corner-to-corner scan path.

They often said a mild fear face was "very scared," missing the true strength of the feeling.

Typical viewers let their eyes dance to the eyes first; the ASD viewers treated the face like a puzzle.

03

How this fits with other research

Giesbers et al. (2020) repeated the task with moving faces and saw longer mouth stares, updating the 2018 static-photo result.

Williams et al. (2002) first showed messy scanning in ASD; Vicky refines this by counting exact in vs. out fixations.

Costa et al. (2017) found shorter looking at any facial part in autistic women, extending the gaze-reduction pattern to gender-specific data.

04

Why it matters

Your client may look at faces but still misread how strong an emotion is.

Teach rules like "half-closed eyes plus raised brows equals a little fear, wide eyes equals a lot."

Pair the rule with a quick prompt: "Check the eyes first" to replace the rigid corner scan.

Free CEUs

Want CEUs on This Topic?

The ABA Clubhouse has 60+ free CEUs — live every Wednesday. Ethics, supervision & clinical topics.

Join Free →
→ Action — try this Monday

Before role-play, show one emotion card, model an eye-first glance, and ask "mild, medium, or strong?" to practice intensity labels.

02At a glance

Intervention
not applicable
Design
quasi experimental
Population
autism spectrum disorder
Finding
negative

03Original abstract

The eye-tracking experiment was carried out to assess fixation duration and scan paths that individuals with and without high-functioning autism spectrum disorders employed when identifying simple and complex emotions. Participants viewed human photos of facial expressions and decided on the identification of emotion, the negative-positive emotion orientation, and the degree of emotion intensity. Results showed that there was an atypical emotional processing in the high-functioning autism spectrum disorder group to identify facial emotions when eye-tracking data were compared between groups. We suggest that the high-functioning autism spectrum disorder group prefers to use a rule-bound categorical approach as well as featured processing strategy in the facial emotion recognition tasks. Therefore, the high-functioning autism spectrum disorder group more readily distinguishes overt emotions such as happiness and sadness. However, they perform more inconsistently in covert emotions such as disgust and angry, which demand more cognitive strategy employment during emotional perception. Their fixation time in eye-tracking data demonstrated a significant difference from that of their controls when judging complex emotions, showing reduced "in" gazes and increased "out" gazes. The data were in compliance with the findings in their emotion intensity ratings which showed individuals with autism spectrum disorder misjudge the intensity of complex emotions especially the emotion of fear.

Autism : the international journal of research and practice, 2018 · doi:10.1177/1362361316667830