Assessment & Research

Effectiveness of cognitive behavioural therapy (CBT) programmes for anxiety or depression in adults with intellectual disabilities: A review of the literature.

Unwin et al. (2016) · Research in developmental disabilities 2016
★ The Verdict

CBT is doable for adults with mild ID and may slightly cut depression, but the evidence base is tiny and exercise shows bigger gains.

✓ Read this if BCBAs in adult day-hab or residential settings serving clients with mood complaints.
✗ Skip if Clinicians working with severe-profound ID or solely with children.

01Research in Context

01

What this study did

Unwin et al. (2016) hunted for every paper that tested CBT for anxiety or depression in adults with intellectual disability.

They found only 11 small studies. Most used simple CBT workbooks or group lessons.

All studies together had fewer than 200 adults, almost all with mild ID.

02

What they found

CBT sessions were easy to run and no one dropped out because the lessons were too hard.

Depression scores went down a little, but only a handful of people were tracked after therapy ended.

For anxiety, the evidence was even thinner—too few studies to trust the result.

03

How this fits with other research

Cox et al. (2015) ran one of the very trials Gemma counted. Their trans-diagnostic CBT manual produced large symptom drops that lasted 3–6 months. This single strong result lifts the “weakly positive” label Gemma gave the whole set.

Delgado-Lobete et al. (2020) looked at exercise instead of CBT. Their meta-analysis of 18 trials found very large reductions in anxiety and depression for adults with ID. Exercise looks more powerful than CBT right now, but the two treatments have never been tested head-to-head.

Dewsbury (2003) warned that depression in ID is hard to measure. Gemma’s review still relied on those same shaky tools, so small score changes might reflect measurement noise rather than true mood gains.

04

Why it matters

If you serve adults with mild ID and mood problems, CBT is worth trying, but keep expectations modest. Use short concrete worksheets and picture-based feeling cards. Track progress with the Glasgow Depression Scale or simple daily mood ratings. Until bigger trials appear, combine CBT with movement breaks or walking groups to tap the stronger exercise evidence.

Free CEUs

Want CEUs on This Topic?

The ABA Clubhouse has 60+ free CEUs — live every Wednesday. Ethics, supervision & clinical topics.

Join Free →
→ Action — try this Monday

Add a 10-minute mood check and 15-minute walk to your current CBT group and graph both metrics.

02At a glance

Intervention
not applicable
Design
systematic review
Population
intellectual disability, anxiety disorder
Finding
weakly positive

03Original abstract

Relatively little is known about the application of cognitive behavioural therapy (CBT) to people with intellectual disabilities (ID). This review sought to synthesise available evidence on the effectiveness of CBT for anxiety or depression to assess the current level of evidence and make recommendations for future research. A comprehensive systematic literature search was conducted to identify qualitative and quantitative studies. Robust criteria were applied to select papers that were relevant to the review. Included papers were subject to quality appraisal. Eleven out of the 223 studies considered met our inclusion criteria and were included in the review in which CBT was used with participants with ID and anxiety (n=3), depression (n=4) or a mixed clinical presentation (n=4). There remains a paucity of evidence of effectiveness, however, the studies indicate that CBT is feasible and well-tolerated and may be effective in reducing symptoms of depression among adults with mild ID. Qualitative data reflect a positive perception of CBT amongst clients and carers. Further research is required to investigate the components of CBT, suitability for CBT, and requisite skills for CBT, which uses valid, sensitive and more holistic outcome measures.

Research in developmental disabilities, 2016 · doi:10.1016/j.ridd.2015.12.010