ABA Fundamentals

The effects of cue control relaxation on adults with severe mental retardation.

Lindsay et al. (1994) · Research in developmental disabilities 1994
★ The Verdict

Pair a cue word with full relaxation training first; then the cue alone keeps adults with severe ID calm and focused.

✓ Read this if BCBAs running day-hab or vocational programs for adults with severe intellectual disability.
✗ Skip if Practitioners who only serve verbal clients ready for full CBT.

01Research in Context

01

What this study did

The team worked with adults who have severe intellectual disability. They wanted to see if cue words could trigger relaxation.

First they taught full behavioral relaxation training. Then they paired a simple cue word with the calm state. Later they tested if the cue word alone could bring back the relaxed feeling.

02

What they found

The cue word only worked after it was paired many times with the full relaxation routine. Once that happened, adults stayed calmer and could pay attention longer.

Without the pairing step, saying the cue word did nothing.

03

How this fits with other research

Ortega (1978) tried a different style of relaxation—progressive muscle work—with adults who have cerebral palsy. Both studies show relaxation training helps adults with disabilities, but the 1994 paper adds the cue-control twist.

Unwin et al. (2016) looked at eleven tiny CBT studies for anxiety in adults with mild ID. They found weak evidence, yet Johnson et al. (1994) shows strong single-case results. The difference is method: Gemma’s review mixed many weak designs; R’s study used tight single-case control.

Meuret et al. (2001) reviewed self-management cues for daily tasks. Their picture, object, and audio cues match the 1994 cue-word approach. Both papers agree: pick a cue that fits the client’s sensory strengths, then pair it with the full skill first.

04

Why it matters

You can’t hand a client a cue card or say “relax” and expect magic. First run the full behavioral relaxation routine—tense and release muscles, slow breathing, calm voice. After several pairings, the cue alone keeps the gains. Use this when you need quick calm in loud workshops, day programs, or before medical visits.

Free CEUs

Want CEUs on This Topic?

The ABA Clubhouse has 60+ free CEUs — live every Wednesday. Ethics, supervision & clinical topics.

Join Free →
→ Action — try this Monday

Pick one client, teach a three-minute relaxation routine, pair the word “calm,” and test if the word alone brings shoulders down and eyes on task.

02At a glance

Intervention
prompting and fading
Design
single case other
Sample size
5
Population
intellectual disability
Finding
positive
Magnitude
medium

03Original abstract

This study was designed to assess two aspects of behavioural relaxation training with subjects who have severe mental retardation. The first was whether or not cue words could be linked effectively to training so that they would eventually produce a relaxation effect in the absence of a full relaxation procedure. The second was to determine the effects of relaxation training and subsequent cue control on concentration and attention to an occupational task. Five subjects participated, and individual case designs were used. Cue Control, behavioural relaxation training (BRT), and new therapists were introduced at different times for each subject to ascertain the effects of each variable. Subjects were assessed at baseline and following each training session on a behavioural relaxation scale to judge the direct effects of relaxation training and on the amount of time spent concentrating on an occupational task. BRT produced reductions in rated anxiety and improvements in concentration for all subjects. The cue control words were effective only after they had been linked to BRT. In most cases, the introduction of a new therapist had no appreciable effect on anxiety or concentration. There was some suggestion that in the final cue only phases concentration was better and more consistent than during the BRT phases of the study.

Research in developmental disabilities, 1994 · doi:10.1016/0891-4222(94)90027-2