Brief report: do service dog providers placing dogs with children with developmental disabilities use outcome measures and, if so, what are they?
Service-dog providers lack standardized outcome measurement—offer them validated tools like the ABLLS-R or SRS-2 for future placements.
01Research in Context
What this study did
Butterly et al. (2013) sent a short survey to every U.S. service-dog agency that places dogs with children who have autism or other developmental delays.
They asked one simple question: Do you track how the kids do after the dog moves in, and if so, how?
What they found
Most providers expect happy changes in mood, safety, and family life, but they measure these changes with casual chats, not real tests.
No agency used a validated tool such as the ABLLS-R, SRS-2, or even a sleep log.
How this fits with other research
Emerson (2013) looked at every animal study for autism up to 2013 and found the same hole: all 14 papers glow with parent stories, yet none used strong designs.
Simard et al. (2026) later filled part of that hole. They tracked sleep before and after a dog arrived. Parents said kids slept better, but wrist-watch data showed no change for the child. This clash shows why we need both parent words and hard numbers.
Ghai et al. (2022) asked 544 ABA clinicians if they bring animals into sessions. One in five already do, but they also fly without clear outcome rules. Together these papers trace one theme: animals enter autism services fast, while measurement lags behind.
Why it matters
If you work with a family getting a service dog, hand the team a simple pre-post sheet before the dog arrives. Pick one area the dog should help—sleep, language, or tantrums—and track it weekly with a quick scale or tally. In 30 days you will have data the provider never collects, and you can adjust ABA goals with real numbers instead of hope.
Want CEUs on This Topic?
The ABA Clubhouse has 60+ free CEUs — live every Wednesday. Ethics, supervision & clinical topics.
Join Free →Email the family’s dog agency a one-page data sheet that tracks the target behavior you already graph in ABA.
02At a glance
03Original abstract
The aim of this study was to identify the outcomes expected and assessed by those providing service dogs to children with developmental disabilities. Seventeen registered service dog providers were invited to complete a mixed methods online survey. Five providers, who prepared dogs to work with a wide range of conditions and behaviours, mainly Asperger's syndrome, autism and communication disorders, completed the survey. All five participants reported that they expected to see positive changes as a consequence of the service dog placement, in both the recipient child and their family, including improvements in attention span and language skills, as well as increased familial cohesion. Survey responses indicated that not all desired outcomes were routinely assessed. The range of assessments used were interviews, intake conversations, pre-placement questionnaires, child social diaries filled in by parents, follow up surveys after placement, and child observation by parents. No specifically named valid and reliable clinical or research measures were referred to, showing an emphasis on assessments from parents and service dog providers. It is not clear whether pre-intervention assessments are repeated systematically at follow-up, which could show robust intervention effects. There is scope for professionals in developmental disability to work with service dog providers to improve the evidence base in this field.
Journal of autism and developmental disorders, 2013 · doi:10.1007/s10803-013-1803-1