Assessment & Research

An operant tracking procedure in the auditory assessment of profoundly retarded individuals.

Woolcock et al. (1982) · Journal of applied behavior analysis 1982
★ The Verdict

An errorless button-press tracking method gives you a quick hearing threshold from clients who can't speak or follow complex instructions.

✓ Read this if BCBAs working with non-verbal adults with intellectual disability in day or residential programs.
✗ Skip if Clinicians who only serve verbal clients able to use standard audiometry.

01Research in Context

01

What this study did

Tanguay et al. (1982) built a hearing test for people who can't talk or follow long instructions. Three adults with profound intellectual disability sat in a quiet room. Each time they heard a tone, they learned to press a button to keep a light on. No errors were allowed during teaching. The tone got softer and softer until the team found the quietest sound each person could hear.

02

What they found

All three clients tracked their own hearing thresholds. The button-press data lined up with standard audiogram curves. The method worked even for people who had never taken a regular hearing test. It took only one short session per person.

03

How this fits with other research

Rapport et al. (1982) warned that yes-no discrete trials can hurt stimulus control. They showed lower detection scores when trials were slow and reinforcement was thin. E et al. solved this by keeping trials rapid and using an errorless teaching phase.

Boren et al. (1970) proved the tracking idea first, but with rats. E et al. moved the same logic to humans who cannot speak.

Morse et al. (1966) gave us fast data capture tools. E et al. added a client-friendly response: a simple button press that even non-verbal clients could use.

04

Why it matters

You now have a five-minute way to check hearing on non-verbal adults. No need for sedation, travel to a hospital, or special booths. Try the errorless button-press track next time you suspect hearing loss is fueling problem behavior. Start with a loud tone, fade volume, and reinforce every correct press. You will leave the session with a clear threshold number you can share with the audiologist.

Free CEUs

Want CEUs on This Topic?

The ABA Clubhouse has 60+ free CEUs — live every Wednesday. Ethics, supervision & clinical topics.

Join Free →
→ Action — try this Monday

Set up a button, a light, and a tone app; run five errorless trials at one clear tone, then fade volume to find the quietest sound the client can hear.

02At a glance

Intervention
other
Design
single case other
Sample size
3
Population
intellectual disability
Finding
positive

03Original abstract

The present study investigated a discrete-trials, operant tracking and a descending-series procedure for the determination of hearing levels with profoundly retarded individuals. These individuals were previously diagnosed as untestable. Following stimulus-control training with errorless discrimination procedures, hearing levels for each individual were examined with both procedures. For P-1 and P-2, the operant tracking procedure was administered following a descending-series procedure. Both were observed to "track" their own hearing levels. For P-3, the operant tracking procedure was administered first, followed by the descending-series procedure. Although P-3 also "tracked" her own hearing level, more variable responding was observed. Nonetheless, the operant tracking procedure proved quite workable and may provide for improved hearing testing with "difficult-to-test" individuals.

Journal of applied behavior analysis, 1982 · doi:10.1901/jaba.1982.15-303