Landmine-detection rats: an evaluation of reinforcement procedures under simulated operational conditions.
Hide backup rewards in old places to keep behavior strong after the real reinforcer is gone.
01Research in Context
What this study did
Five rats hunted for landmines in a sandbox. The trainers removed all real mines. They marked empty spots as if mines were there. Then they secretly soaked the soil with TNT scent and later cleaned it up.
When a rat dug at a marked spot, it got no food. When it dug where TNT scent had been, it got a pellet. This let the rats earn food even though no real explosives were present.
What they found
All five rats kept finding every fake mine. Their accuracy stayed high even though digging at the old mine spots no longer paid off.
The TNT-scent trick gave the rats a way to win food. Because food still showed up, the animals kept working hard.
How this fits with other research
Donahoe et al. (2000) showed that non-contingent food can hide extinction. The rat study uses the same idea. Food still appears, so the behavior keeps going.
Nighbor et al. (2018) found that keeping the same sights and sounds boosts resurgence. The rat team kept the same sand, smells, and lights. Yet resurgence did not happen because the TNT spots gave new rewards.
Hanley et al. (1997) removed the person to stop self-injury. The rat team removed the real mine but kept the reward. Both studies show that taking away the real cause while keeping some payoff prevents the behavior from dropping.
Why it matters
You can keep a skill alive even when the natural payoff is gone. Plant fake treats, praise, or tokens in places where the real reward used to be. This keeps clients working while you fade the original reinforcer. Try it when you need to maintain safety responses, academic accuracy, or compliance after the main prize is removed.
Want CEUs on This Topic?
The ABA Clubhouse has 60+ free CEUs — live every Wednesday. Ethics, supervision & clinical topics.
Join Free →Pick one mastered task. Slip an unexpected reward into the old spot once per session to keep the response steady.
02At a glance
03Original abstract
Because the location of landmines is initially unknown, it is impossible to arrange differential reinforcement for accurate detection of landmines by pouched rats working on actual minefields. Therefore, provision must be made for maintenance of accurate responses by an alternative reinforcement strategy. The present experiment evaluated a procedure in which a plastic bag containing 2,4,6-trinitrotoluene (TNT), the active ingredient in most landmines, was placed in contact with the ground in a disturbed area, then removed, to establish opportunities for reinforcement. Each of five rats continued to accurately detect landmines when extinction was arranged for landmine-detection responses and detections of TNT-contaminated locations were reinforced under a fixed-ratio 1 schedule. The results of this translational research study suggest that the TNT-contamination procedure is a viable option for arranging reinforcement opportunities for rats engaged in actual landmine-detection activities and the viability of this procedure is currently being evaluated on minefields in Angola and Mozambique.
Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior, 2014 · doi:10.1002/jeab.83