Evaluating the Feasibility of Methods of Live Data Collection for Sociability Assessments
Live momentary time sampling or duration recording keeps fidelity and IOA high during sociability checks.
01Research in Context
What this study did
Sigwanz et al. (2025) asked a simple question. Can staff score sociability live without hurting data quality?
They tried two low-tech ways: momentary time sampling and duration recording. Staff marked behavior right in the room.
The team watched procedural fidelity and inter-observer agreement. Both stayed high, so the method looks doable.
What they found
Live coding worked. Observers kept good fidelity and high IOA while they watched.
No extra gear or video replay was needed. You can collect solid sociability data on the spot.
How this fits with other research
Tanguay et al. (1982) did something similar. They showed non-verbal clients can track their own hearing thresholds with an operant task. Both studies prove operant-style data can be gathered in real time without fancy tools.
Noordenbos et al. (2012) built an iPhone app for live ABC recording. Sigwanz et al. (2025) go lower-tech: paper, timer, and a pencil still give clean data. The new work extends the 2012 idea to simpler gear and shorter samples.
Morse et al. (1966) used punched-tape machines to log every peck. Today you can get reliable data just by glancing up every 30 s. The lineage shows the field keeps chasing the same goal: fast, cheap, accurate capture.
Why it matters
You can start scoring sociability right away. Bring a timer, mark 15-second looks or peer approaches, and still trust your numbers. No video coding, no extra staff. Try it in your next social-skills probe and see if patterns jump out faster.
Want CEUs on This Topic?
The ABA Clubhouse has 60+ free CEUs — live every Wednesday. Ethics, supervision & clinical topics.
Join Free →Pick one learner, set a 30-second momentary timer, and mark ‘peer-directed’ or ‘adult-directed’ live for ten minutes; compare IOA with a co-worker.
02At a glance
03Original abstract
Abstract Sociability assessments may be useful for determining the function of social interaction; however, intensive data collection requirements may limit their clinical feasibility. The purpose of the current studies was to evaluate the feasibility of implementing sociability assessments while collecting discontinuous versus continuous data. We compared procedural fidelity and interobserver agreement across sociability assessment sessions during which implementers collected no data, momentary time sampling data, or duration data in role-play (both studies) and clinical (study 2) contexts. Most participants exhibited relatively high procedural fidelity and interobserver agreement scores remained high across conditions requiring live momentary time sampling and duration data collection. These findings support the feasibility and adoptability of sociability assessments in research and clinical practice. Directions for future research related to sociability assessments as well as general methods of evaluating the feasibility of different data collection procedures are discussed.
Behavior Analysis in Practice, 2025 · doi:10.1007/s40617-025-01101-9