The living legacy of the Harvard Pigeon Lab: quantitative analysis in the wide world.
The Harvard Pigeon Lab built the math; modern BCBAs can finally use it.
01Research in Context
What this study did
Logue (2002) tells the story of the Harvard Pigeon Lab.
The lab spent decades turning pigeon pecks into numbers.
The paper asks why those math tools rarely leave the lab.
What they found
The review found a living legacy: matching-law equations.
These formulas describe how pigeons split their pecks between keys.
The author wants the same equations tested in everyday human behavior.
How this fits with other research
Jarmolowicz et al. (2021) answered the call.
Their 2021 paper urges BCBAs to use matching law in clinics and classrooms.
Shimp (1968) shows the roots.
That study proved pigeons follow the harmonic version of the law.
Together the papers form a bridge: lab math → real-world practice.
Why it matters
If you run preference assessments, you already use matching logic.
Try plotting reinforcement rates for each task or item.
See if the client’s choice matches the rates.
This quick check can validate your assessment without extra trials.
Get CEUs on This Topic — Free
The ABA Clubhouse has 60+ on-demand CEUs including ethics, supervision, and clinical topics like this one. Plus a new live CEU every Wednesday.
Graph reinforcers per minute vs. client choice percentage and check for a match.
02At a glance
03Original abstract
From the Harvard Pigeon Lab of the 1960s arose a behavior-analytic approach that was quantitative and rigorous, rooted in Herrnstein's matching law. Researchers modified the matching law to describe choice behavior in a variety of different settings and examined its relations with other quantitative models. Beginning in the early 1970s, researchers began using the Harvard Pigeon Lab's quantitative framework to study in the laboratory specific aspects of the world outside the laboratory. Much of this work concerned investigations of self-control-choice of a larger, more delayed reinforcer over a smaller, less delayed reinforcer. Experiments using a quantitative framework derived from the matching law have also been conducted outside the laboratory; however, these have been far less frequent. Current and future researchers will benefit the field by devising new, creative ways to investigate the matching law and related quantitative models outside the laboratory. Such research can help to demonstrate the validity of these models as basic principles of behavior, can enhance public opinion of and rewards for such research, and can stimulate further development of the Harvard Pigeon Lab's quantitative approach by using that approach with new variables.
Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior, 2002 · doi:10.1901/jeab.2002.77-357