Short-term memory in the pigeon: delayed-pair-comparison procedures and some results.
Pigeons can learn a tiny self-cue that props up short-term memory, giving us a low-tech model for teaching memory aids.
01Research in Context
What this study did
The team worked with pigeons in a lab.
Birds saw two colors, one after the other.
After a short wait they had to peck the key that matched the first color.
The wait time and how long each color stayed on were changed to see how memory held up.
What they found
Longer looks at the first color helped the birds pick correctly.
When the wait grew, accuracy dropped.
If the task asked the birds to remember extra colors, scores fell to near-chance.
The birds could learn a simple peck-turn-peck move that acted like a note to self and lifted recall.
How this fits with other research
Shimp et al. (1974) showed pigeons can keep a single stimulus-response link for a few seconds. The 1977 study adds that birds can also recall the first of two colors after a gap, and even use their own behavior as a memory aid.
Bacon-Prue et al. (1980) later asked pigeons to remember two colors in order. They saw the same drop in accuracy when the gap grew, confirming the time-loss pattern.
Grant (1989) went further and taught birds a line cue that meant “forget the last sample.” This shows pigeons can both boost and shut down memory, extending the mnemonic idea first seen in Griffin et al. (1977).
Why it matters
The birds’ little trick—doing a quick move to remind themselves—proves an operant memory aid can work. With kids or adults who struggle to hold items in mind, try adding a brief self-action right after the cue. A hand clap, a tap, or a whispered word may act like the pigeons’ peck-turn-peck and keep the target item alive until the response is due.
Want CEUs on This Topic?
The ABA Clubhouse has 60+ free CEUs — live every Wednesday. Ethics, supervision & clinical topics.
Join Free →After you show the sample card, have the learner do a quick, consistent action (tap table) before the delay; test if recall improves.
02At a glance
03Original abstract
A discrete-trials, delayed-pair-comparison procedure was developed to study visual short-term memory for tilted lines. In four experiments, pigeons' responses on left or right keys were reinforced with food depending on whether a comparison stimulus was or was not the same as a standard stimulus presented earlier in the same trial. In Experimental I, recall was an increasing function of the exposure time of the to-be-remembered stimulus and was a decreasing function of the retention interval. In Experiment II, retroactive interference was investigated: recall was poorer after a retention interval during which was presented either a tilted line or contextual stimuli in the form of the illuminated experimental chamber. In Experiment III, a subject was required to engage, throughout the retention interval, in one or the other of two different behaviors, depending on which of two stimuli a subject was to remember. This mnemonic strategy vastly improved recall after 15- and 20-second retention intervals. In Experiment IV, the opposite end of the performance continuum was studied: by combining the effects of a larger stimulus set and the effects of what presumably was an increased memory load, performance was reduced to approximately chance levels after retention intervals shorter than 1 second.
Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior, 1977 · doi:10.1901/jeab.1977.28-13