ABA Fundamentals

The effects of schedule history and the opportunity for adjunctive responding on behavior during a fixed-interval schedule of reinforcement.

Johnson et al. (1991) · Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior 1991
★ The Verdict

Old schedules and small side behaviors can erase the fixed-interval scallop.

✓ Read this if BCBAs writing FI or FI-like token programs in clinics or classrooms.
✗ Skip if Practitioners using only VR or DRL schedules with no adjunctive behaviors.

01Research in Context

01

What this study did

Researchers worked with rats on a fixed-interval 60-second schedule.

First they gave each rat a different history: long pauses, fast pressing, or no special training.

Then they let half the rats drink water during the session while the others stayed dry.

They counted lever presses to see how history and water changed the usual FI scallop.

02

What they found

Rats trained to pause pressed slowly and steady—no scallop.

Rats trained to press fast kept the high rate—also no scallop.

Water mattered only for the pause group: it made them press even less.

The normal FI curve vanished when history or water pulled the other way.

03

How this fits with other research

Okouchi et al. (2006) later showed the same thing in pigeons: just remembering a slow schedule can flatten the curve.

Rogers-Warren et al. (1976) proved that extra reinforcers also wipe out the scallop; M et al. add water as another curve-killer.

Johnson et al. (1994) zoomed in on when the water appears; together the papers say both timing and history set the final pattern.

04

Why it matters

Your client’s past schedules are baggage they carry into every new program.

If a kid learned to wait 30 s for tokens, he may stay slow even on a new FI 10 s.

Check for side behaviors—sipping water, doodling, scrolling—that could pull effort away from the target response.

Start sessions with a probe: run a few FI cycles and watch the curve; if it’s flat, reshape history first, then move on.

Free CEUs

Want CEUs on This Topic?

The ABA Clubhouse has 60+ free CEUs — live every Wednesday. Ethics, supervision & clinical topics.

Join Free →
→ Action — try this Monday

Run a one-minute FI probe; if the curve is flat, insert a brief pause-training or speed-training phase before the main program.

02At a glance

Intervention
not applicable
Design
single case other
Sample size
4
Population
not specified
Finding
not reported

03Original abstract

The effects of schedule history and the availability of an adjunctive response (polydipsia) on fixed-interval schedule performance were investigated. Two rats first pressed levers under a schedule of food reinforcement with an interresponse time greater than 11 s, and 2 others responded under a fixed-ratio 40 schedule. All 4 were then exposed to a fixed-interval 15-s schedule. Water was continuously available under these conditions, but after responding became stable on the fixed-interval schedule, access was experimentally manipulated. With water freely available, subjects did not display characteristic fixed-interval response rates and patterns (i.e., scalloping or break-and-run). Instead, they exhibited predictable, stable patterns of behavior as a function of their schedule histories: Subjects with the interresponse-time history exhibited low response rates, and those with the fixed-ratio history exhibited high rates. Manipulating the amount of water available resulted in marked changes in response rates for rats with the interresponse-time history but not for those with the fixed-ratio history. The results illustrate the multiple causation of behavior by its previous and current schedules of reinforcement and other concurrent factors.

Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior, 1991 · doi:10.1901/jeab.1991.55-313