ABA Fundamentals

Varying the temporal placement of a drinking opportunity in a fixed-interval schedule.

Avila et al. (1994) · Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior 1994
★ The Verdict

Water offered late in a fixed-interval schedule gets ignored, so move adjunctive breaks earlier.

✓ Read this if BCBAs running fixed-interval or DRL programs with built-in water or sensory breaks.
✗ Skip if Clinicians using only VR or DR schedules with no adjunctive activities.

01Research in Context

01

What this study did

Johnson et al. (1994) worked with rats on a fixed-interval 60-second food schedule.

They gave the rats a 5-second chance to drink water at different spots in the interval.

The water probe could pop up early, middle, or right before the next food pellet.

02

What they found

Rats drank less water when the probe came late in the interval.

Lever-pressing patterns changed too—late probes made the usual scallop shape wobble.

Early probes barely touched drinking or pressing, but late probes cut both.

03

How this fits with other research

Anger et al. (1976) showed monkeys drink most at 120-second intervals. Johnson et al. (1994) zooms in to show even within one interval, timing still matters.

Davison et al. (1991) found past schedule history can mess up the scallop. Johnson et al. (1994) adds that just dropping a water probe late can do the same thing.

Castilla et al. (2013) later showed hungry rats drink more overall. Johnson et al. (1994) shows that even if the rat is hungry, a probe near food time still cuts drinking.

04

Why it matters

If you give a client water breaks during DTT or classroom schedules, watch the clock. A drink offered right before the next reinforcer may be refused or rushed. Slide the break earlier to keep both drinking and task behavior steady.

Free CEUs

Want CEUs on This Topic?

The ABA Clubhouse has 60+ free CEUs — live every Wednesday. Ethics, supervision & clinical topics.

Join Free →
→ Action — try this Monday

Shift any mid-session water or sensory break 10-15 seconds earlier and watch if the client drinks more and stays on task.

02At a glance

Intervention
not applicable
Design
single case other
Sample size
3
Population
neurotypical
Finding
mixed

03Original abstract

Three rats, lever pressing for food delivered on a fixed-interval 128-s schedule, were presented with a 16-s opportunity to drink from a retractable water source. The temporal placement of the water probe within the reinforcement cycle was varied sequentially, in steps of 16 s. Although the lever-pressing pattern was modulated by the intercalated water probe, water consumption during the probe itself was a decreasing function of time from the following reinforcer. These results were interpreted as evidence against the notion that schedule-induced drinking is a "ubiquitous" phenomenon and are congruent with results from other "intruded stimulus" experiments.

Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior, 1994 · doi:10.1901/jeab.1994.62-307