A Comparison of Stimulus Set Sizes: Systematic Replication with Operant Analysis Acquisition Criteria
Let the learner choose tact vs intraverbal teaching—both work and echoic counts can flag when secondary targets are starting to stick.
01Research in Context
What this study did
Zhi et al. (2023) asked a simple question: does it matter if we slip extra language as "instructive feedback" during tact trials or during intraverbal trials?
They used an alternating-treatments design with preschoolers on the spectrum. Each child got both formats while the team tracked how fast the primary and bonus words were learned.
Mastery was judged with Operant Analysis, meaning each single word had to reach the goal, not the whole set.
What they found
Both formats worked. Kids mastered the main targets and the extra words at about the same speed.
When the children could pick, they chose the tact format. Echoic prompts also dropped on their own as the words neared mastery, giving a quick live signal that learning was kicking in.
How this fits with other research
Chang et al. (2024) and Cordeiro et al. (2022) already showed that Operant Analysis beats set-wide mastery. Zhi’s team adds that the same rule holds when you tack on instructive feedback.
Vladescu et al. (2021) found 3-6 item sets beat 12-item sets for teens, while Kodak et al. (2020) saw the opposite in younger kids. Zhi lands on the small-set side, supporting the idea that age or procedure tweaks change the sweet spot.
Grow et al. (2017) and Erhard et al. (2025) prove instructive feedback can sprout new skills without extra trials. Zhi keeps that benefit while showing the carrier task (tact vs intraverbal) doesn’t slow the show.
Why it matters
You can stop worrying about which verbal operant hosts the bonus words. Pick the one the learner likes, keep sets small, and watch echoics. When echoes fade, it’s a cheap cue that the secondary targets are about to stick, so you can move on or add new ones.
Want CEUs on This Topic?
The ABA Clubhouse has 60+ free CEUs — live every Wednesday. Ethics, supervision & clinical topics.
Join Free →Offer the child a choice between tact or intraverbal trials, keep each set at three to six words, and stop prompting when echoics drop below one per minute.
02At a glance
03Original abstract
UNLABELLED: Instructive feedback is a procedure that introduces additional stimuli before or after a learning trial and can result in the acquisition of stimuli not directly taught. Further research may help us better understand the conditions under which instructive feedback is effective and preferred. In the present study, the experimenters presented intraverbal instructive feedback during tact and intraverbal teaching and compared the rate of acquisition for primary and secondary targets with a 6-year-old autistic child. The experimenters evaluated preference for learning method with a concurrent-chains procedure. Finally, the experimenters measured the frequency of echoics during teaching sessions. The tact and intraverbal conditions resulted in similar acquisition of primary and secondary targets, and the participant reported a preference for the tact condition. Further, there was initially a higher frequency of echoics to the primary target. As acquisition increased toward mastery, there were fewer echoics to the primary target and higher echoics to the secondary target. These results suggest that overt echoic behavior may facilitate the acquisition of secondary targets for some learners and demonstrate how clinicians may provide the learner with a choice of teaching strategies. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s40616-025-00215-z.
Behavior Analysis in Practice, 2023 · doi:10.1007/s40617-023-00793-1